531
submitted 2 months ago by minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] notabot@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

'Sealed sender' seems to avoid this by not actually requiring the client to authenticate to the server at all, and relying on the recipient to validate that it's signed by the sender they expect from the encrypted data in the envelope. As I mentioned in another reply, I’m just going on what they’ve published on the system, so either I could be completely wrong, or they could be being misleading, but it does look like they’ve tried to address this issue.

[-] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 3 points 2 months ago

I’m just going on what they’ve published on the system, so either I could be completely wrong, or they could be being misleading

same here overall. thank you for responding.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
531 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

31609 readers
172 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS