34
Music labels sue Internet Archive over digitized record collection
(www.reuters.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
30 readers
1 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!
founded 2 years ago
Sigh. Once again, it looks like the Internet Archive has gone beyond simply being an archive and has stuck its foot into the legal woodchipper.
If they survive these lawsuits I hope they learn a serious lesson from all this. It's great that they save and preserve data like this, but they should stop poking the bear. Only make the abandoned stuff easy to download. If something's currently commercially available then you can leave it up to the pirates to make it "free."
„All available on streaming“ is a lie, there are so many artists on them with half of the discography missing.
They're only suing over a subset of the recordings. If half the discography is missing the other half is not, after all.
Isn't that what they're doing? Ive been following the LP section for years now and they make most of the uploads unavailable, you can only do 30 second previews. There a whole section of "unlocked" LPs that seems to be abandoned stuff.
The lawsuit claims otherwise, as I quoted.
I suppose the record labels might be outright lying, but if they're lying that blatantly in the lawsuit itself that seems likely to backfire. Their lawyers are generally pretty good so I would be surprised if they made a mistake like that.
My guess is they want complete takedown control like they have on YouTube. No real recourse for the platform or for the uploader. Doesn't matter how fair Archive is being.
Maybe that's their underlying goal, but that underlying goal doesn't matter to the point I was making. By putting up music for download that the publishers are currently actively selling the Internet Archive basically handed the music publishers a loaded gun.
It's just like the "emergency library" debacle, the publishers were fine with turning a blind eye to the Archive violating their copyrights as long as the Internet Archive didn't try doing anything that would significantly hurt their sales. They could have sued them earlier but it wasn't a legal slam dunk until the Internet Archive pulled that stupid stunt.
If they lose this lawsuit (which they will) then all archiving of anything which isn't public domain is in danger.