265
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

The problem you have there is called a feedback loop. A vicious spiral. The whole thing moves right with each election.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the Republicans have been successful in accomplishing their goals by not voting repeatedly for 20+ years! /s

ffs

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Look, if you were using this extension of time to do something better, to build dual power, to corrode the foundation of the system, I'd agree with you. That's the point of extensions, no? To get time. The destination is the same in both scenarios, but you have time in the lesser one. Are you using that time on not-you activity?

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Welp, better to tiptoe to the right than double-time goose step. A slow move to the right is better for leftists than a fast one.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Counterpoint, libs cared about kids in cages when it was trump doing it. Ive never seen so many people energetic and aware about government abuses. It was the same with war in the middleast when Obama took over from Bush. All the average antiwar blues stopped watching and couldnt car less about drone bombing funerals and ambulances.

The two party system does not promote engagement or representation. I get this is a bigger issue than the election but my biggest fear is that the slow walk to fascism under the "we're the good party" will be more enduring and successful than the attempts from Red to March forward.

The average lib "shut up and vote blue or you support fascism" crybully will fall asleep again for four years and sleepwalk their way to the same goal without any self reflection along the way.

Note this is not in favor of accelerationism, but a criticism of this idea that all we can do is slow the roll with a vote every now and then and throw our hands up.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

Note this is not in favor of accelerationism, but a criticism of this idea that all we can do is slow the roll with a vote every now and then and throw our hands up.

No one has suggested that idea. It certainly isn't all we can do, but it is the minimum. The alternative is accelerationism.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Is it better? It seems like the creeping motion is much better at avoiding opposition than the double-time. Sort of like how the climate is heating just slow enough for most of the humans to think that it's somewhat normal and usual, and the crises are somewhat normal.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, however bad the creep is, accelerationism Is way worse

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I didn't say accelerationism. Accelerationism is a fascist position.

I'm saying that the issue here is people not realizing that,

as an analogy,

Being threatened with a gun to the head vs being threatened with a dart containing deadly radioactive oncogenic particles should be treated the same. The problem is optimism and hope, it's what allows conservatives to play the long game.

And in terms of the strategy you hold dear, understand that capitalists and their fascist pets will bring down the whole biosphere.

Essentially, the ethics of this aren't about "lesser evil", they're about how willing are you to burden the youngest generations and soon to be born with an exponentially more difficult (deadly) challenge, so you can live your life in the "normal" way and keep your head down.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

When you're talking about the merits of the greater evil, i.e. speeding towards fascism so people are more likely to take direct revolutionary action, you're talking about accelerationism. However you try to justify it to yourself, that's what you're promoting. And it's fundamentally a gamble, you're hoping that it leads to a regime that can be deposed, and a populace willing and able to depose it. The gamble could very easily just lead to enduring fascism.

I use the tools at my disposal. Voting for the lesser evil buys time and fosters a slightly, but distinctly, more favorable political landscape. That gives people the opportunity to organize, to spread their message, to build campaigns for representatives that represent them, and elevate those representatives to higher offices.

how willing are you to burden the youngest generations and soon to be born with an exponentially more difficult (deadly) challenge, so you can live your life in the "normal" way and keep your head down.

The irony is palpable. This is precisely the outcome of your strategy: give the young generations a despotic fascist regime they'll have to overthrow with chaos and bloodshed, rather than a functioning democracy that they can push to the left.

Yes, our system is dominated by capitalists and fascists, but that's precisely because 30+% of people refuse to use their vote. The system has within it the mechanisms for meaningful change, fantasies about a popular uprising against a despotic government are childish and irresponsible.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I guess you'll learn the hard way.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago
[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

"The hard way" being you not having to articulate any coherent or effective praxis? Your strategy makes no sense for your goals. That kind of dramatic idealism gets innocent people killed, and doesn't even yield the results you want. Real life isn't a dystopian YA novel.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

I'm not being idealistic, you are. That's idealism, it's just extremely mediocre. You're suffering from the belief that you can make incremental progress when you can't. For example, if you're American, check your rights with regards to family planning. How's that going?

The problem is that you're not radical enough, and the future now can only be radical, there is no more room for "middle of the road" incrementalism.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

"I know you are but what am I?" is neither coherent nor effective praxis.

Our rights with family planning were demolished because fascists vote, and idealists like you don't. Why would you think this supports your opinion? We're suffering from your belief that incremental progress isn't worth it.

Why don't you focus on whether you're going to choose your childhood friend or the dreamy bad boy in your dystopian revolution fantasy, and leave political discourse to the grownups. Fewer innocent people will die that way.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
265 points (80.6% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
3861 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS