Image is of one of Ireland's only manned navy ships, the Samuel Beckett. Image sourced from this BBC article.
Putler has been HUMILIATED by the Kursk offensive and this proves that Russia's army is in tatters and unable even to defend its own territory. However, it is simultaneously true that Russia poses an existential threat to countries thousands of miles away, as this recent Politico article demonstrates. Ireland - a country that immediately springs to mind as one surrounded by enemies - is being bullied due to its lack of military.
Despite bearing responsibility for 16 percent of the EU’s territorial waters, and the fact that 75 percent of transatlantic undersea cables pass through or near Irish waters, Ireland is totally defenseless. And I mean completely unable to protect critical infrastructure, or even pretend to secure its own borders. [...] Ireland’s “navy” of six patrol vessels is currently operating with one operational ship due to chronic staff shortages. [...] Ireland simply has no undersea capabilities. How could it, when it barely spends 0.2 percent of GDP on security and defense? And it has, in effect, abdicated responsibility for protecting the Europe’s northwestern borders.
For all we know, the dreaded sea-people from the Bronze Age Collapse could soon emerge from the North Atlantic.
Unfortunately, things are even worse up in the skies. Ireland has no combat jets, and it’s the only country in Europe that can’t monitor its own airspace due to the lack of primary radar systems. Instead, the country has outsourced its security to Britain in a technically secret agreement between Dublin and London, which effectively cedes control over Irish air space to the Royal Air Force. This must be the luck of the Irish — smile and get someone else to protect you for free.
While this is very silly, rearmament has long been a part of US imperial strategy on an economic level. Desai, discussing the US imperial strategy in the WW2 period:
By 1947 [...] the domestic postwar consumer boom was nearing its end. While financing exports became more urgent, the 1946 elections returned a Congress unlikely to approve further loans. Now the Truman Administration concocted the ‘red menace’ to ‘scare the hell out of the country’, enunciated the Truman Doctrine of US support for armed resistance to ‘subjugation’ which launched the cold war, and Congress granted $400 million to prevent left-wing triumphs in Greece and Turkey in 1947.
One reading of history states that the US was so intimidated by the USSR that this forced a policy of massive arms production even outside of official wartime. Why this arms production is not occurring today can be puzzling, and (very reasonably) explained by neoliberals exporting industrial production overseas. However, a different historical reading can explain both the first Cold War, and the ongoing situation in which American weaponry is being almost purposefully given in insufficient numbers to give Ukraine a chance of victory and thus only prolonging their suffering (while generating massive profit for the military-industrial complex):
In this sense the Cold War was not the cause of US imperial policy but its effect. It combined financing exports with fighting combined development by national capitalisms as well as communism. When such ‘totalitarian regimes’ threatened ‘free peoples’, ‘America’s world economic responsibilities’ included aid to countries battling them.
By selling massively expensive weapons to Europe, America could simultaneously guarantee export markets for its industries, trap Europe into reliance on American industries at the expense of their own, and divert European funds away from constructing factories which could compete with American ones. Providing a way to defend against Soviet communism (and now Russian "imperialism") is merely a happy side-effect, and so the lack of effectiveness of American weaponry is causing no great panic among the military-industrial complex, nor an urgent plan to quintuple artillery shell production or Patriot missile production - the deals for F-35s and such are still there, and they are what matter.
The COTW (Country of the Week) label is designed to spur discussion and debate about a specific country every week in order to help the community gain greater understanding of the domestic situation of often-understudied nations. If you've wanted to talk about the country or share your experiences, but have never found a relevant place to do so, now is your chance! However, don't worry - this is still a general news megathread where you can post about ongoing events from any country.
The Country of the Week is Ireland! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Please check out the HexAtlas!
The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week's thread is here.
Israel-Palestine Conflict
Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:
UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.
English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.
English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.
Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.
Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Sources:
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Speaking in terms of PSL for theory: Liberation News is our newspaper which includes political analysis, Liberation School is short-form theory, and 1804 Books is the party-adjacent publisher where long-form theory and historical analysis is published. We have an internal-only party publication focused on specific tactical analysis and sharing party experiences for development, but obviously I can't share that.
The fundamental strategy at the moment is party building and developing a socialist consciousness. We apply the ML line that the vanguard party is the most historically tested vehicle for people's revolution, and so we need to build institutional legitimacy and capacity by contributing meaningfully to ongoing struggles. Our Palestine work is only partially about the street protests. We also do BDS campaigns, have party cadre in important union positions pushing labor action for Palestine with some success (for security reasons and the way US anti-communist law works, I can't be specific), and have run a huge array of fundraising, educational, solidarity building (eg Chinese, Black, and Puerto Rican solidarity with Palestine) projects, etc. The centralized and disciplined organization of PSL and our partner orgs (especially PYM) are the primary reason this movement has lasted so much longer than your average American protest movement - our continuous task is to move from the moderately disruptive and chaotic street protest that defines the American left of the last 20 years into a disciplined, revolutionary, and strategically centralized communist movement. A huge amount of that work is base building and community support in poor, racialized, and internally colonized communities.
I know all that, I have lived in the US before (just for a few years though) and I am familiar with PSL. I am asking the more fundamental questions here:
I still don’t see the major questions answered:
Thanks in advance.
Yes please share your plans for armed struggle
Comrade, I don't think anyone disagrees that the US is a very long way off from a revolution. It's uncharitable to say that no real organizing is being done because the American left is too small and weak to bring about the end to the genocide in the timeframe that we want.
You’re being too generous, to be honest.
You can’t even share your plans for armed struggle (on Hexbear of all places) because there are NO plans for armed struggle among the American left. There is NO militant wing in any “serious” left wing party in America.
You do have a valid point, but the conclusion that follows this argument is that the American left is already doing all they can to stop the US from supporting genocide. If this is the case, then it’s not uncharitable to say that the American left really does not have a real organization if that is all they are capable of doing.
The principal contradiction is imperialism. Our goal, struggling in the heart of empire, is to do whatever is within our capacity to weaken the ability of the empire to operate. Internally, though, our essential path is through the internally colonized Black nation in the US. We are (among other things) a Black Nationalist party, and building the capacity for national self-determination among Black Americans would cripple the operation of the capitalist system, which relies on a hyper-exploited Black proletariat. We do the same or similar work among other colonized nations - Puerto Rico is a big focus of my branch's local work, for example. Other branches focus heavily on immigrant populations, rural areas, Native nations, etc, as is appropriate for their context. Radicalizing the labor movement is another medium-term objective. The step of actually taking power is through a revolutionary upheaval that dismantles the current state and builds a new one. Everything is about building capacity to actually do that revolution. It's not an apple, etc etc.
Discussing this on an open forum is a security issue. It is something I'm willing to elaborate on in the right context, but I'm not going to expose our position here. I hope you understand.
We understand that our role is as one secondary front in the struggle against the genocide. The primary front is in and around Palestine. Our front's essential responsibility is to stoke and develop anti-imperialist, revolutionary defeatist consciousness and organization to exacerbate the political crisis in the US. That crisis is partially among the ruling class, but it also significantly among the working class - the US is exposing itself to its citizens in a way it hasn't in a long time, and faith in the system is crumbling.
We can do so by leveraging the power of labor unions to disrupt supply chains and reduce capitalist profits, as well as creating self-organizing and sufficiency capacity in working class and racialized communities. We're also working to move people's base disgust with Israel into a developed anti-imperialist position that connects the Palestinian struggle to imperial disruption in Venezuela, China (Taiwan), etc. This is a period of mass openness to radicalization, and we are aggressively capitalizing on that.
Thank you for the answers, really appreciate it.
Let’s discuss further.
I agree with you that the black and disenfranchised minorities really do hold the most revolutionary potential in present day America. However, the relationship to capital is currently that most working class people, and disproportionately black and Hispanic communities, are overburdened by debt under neoliberal finance capitalism, which fundamentally restricts their potential to be mobilized as a revolutionary class.
Like the serfs under feudalism, Marx’s greatest insight into class struggle is the fact that the transformation taking place under industrial capitalism freed the waged labor from the land, and enabling them to be mobilized as a revolutionary proletarian class.
In order to transform the disenfranchised working class communities in America today, your first immediate aim should be to destroy the relation of debt bondage tied to finance capital. What are the concrete mechanisms to achieve this?
How can self-determination of the oppressed groups be achieved when they are divorced from healthcare and public and social services? Are there plans to build a parallel economy within the United States? Or do you intend to seize the means of production? These are serious questions that need to be answered if you want to put forth a serious political program towards taking power.
I’m not trying to be facetious here, but there is nothing to discuss here because there is NO militant wing of the PSL, or any major socialist movements in America for that matter. We can talk about security personnel but there is no serious plans or attempts for an armed struggle, so we can dispense with that.
I agree with the notion that the faith in the system is crumbling. Stoking revolutionary socialist ideas is important in this regard.
However, through the application of Marxist-Leninist principles - how do you predict the American political and socioeconomic situations to be in, say 5 years from now? Using Marxist-Leninist principles, to emphasize.
Once that has been identified, what are the mechanisms to mobilize the disillusioned and disenfrachised masses into advancing the political goals of the party? In other words, using the knowledge of historical and dialectical materialism, how should an American left wing movement position itself such that 5-10 years from now it is in the position to take power?
I am not talking about rhetoric - I am talking about actual strategies that advance the political aims of the movement. Whether you plan to leverage on urban warfare and take over the key infrastructures (Trotsky’s strategy), or through rural bases surrounding the cities (Mao’s strategy), or something else entirely unique to the context of the America, are the key questions about strategy that need to be answered. Without a strategy, there is no movement.
These are all important questions and I never got a satisfactory answers out of that.