70
submitted 3 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

"Flair says it cancelled the flight because the airplane for the flight experienced bird strikes while landing in Vancouver," tribunal member Jeffrey Drozdiak's decision said.

But the airline argued that it should not have to pay.

But Donner and Broadhurst did their own research, consulting the Civil Aviation Daily Occurrence Reporting System โ€“ a federal database that tracks incidents including medical emergencies, navigation errors and flight diversions.

"The results show that Flair did not experience any reported bird strikes during that time. In its dispute response, Flair says the tower sends any occurrences to Transport Canada for input into CADORS," Drozdiak wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 2 points 3 months ago

I suppose it just seems incredible to me that the airline didn't even try to come up with another excuse after they were caught out on the first one. Maybe it really was an executive recreational jaunt to Palm Springs.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
70 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7187 readers
397 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS