974
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by willsenior@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world
  • His disclosures, both from his final year in Congress and his time as Minnesota governor, also show no mutual funds, bonds, private equities, or other securities.
  • No book deals or speaking fees or crypto or racehorse interests.
  • Not even real estate. The couple sold their Mankato, Minnesota, home after moving into the governor's mansion, for below the $315k asking price).
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This guy is doing a great job of making everyone realize just how fucking weird the cons truly are.

And I'm loving every minute of that. I've been calling them creepy weirdos for years - after hearing it said on The Professional Left.

I'm glad this guy is taking it to the national level. The Republicans are getting weirder and weirder by the minute and it's about high time someone with a big platform started pointing out what is so obvious to so many people.

How much time have they spent on attacking a woman from a country they probably couldn't find on a map and that is in a sport they now have to suddenly pretend to care about (do they truly care about any women's sports, if we are being honest?). Way to go, guys. People call you weird and you and get even fucking weirder. 🤣

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This guy is doing a great job of making everyone realize just how fucking weird the cons truly are.

Idk if not having a 401k is a sign of normalcy. I think it is illustrative of the state of the Minnesota economy, relative to the hyper-financialized acceleration in states like New York, Florida, Texas, and California. A statewide elected official who isn't a former hedge fund manager or white shoe lawyer is a refreshing change of pace. But when the last couple of years have seen double-digit growth in every major stock index while inflation raced to match, it's honestly kinda scary to imagine a guy who doesn't have any savings in equity.

I hope this is a sign of a politician who hopes to change the underlying nature of the American economy and not just a guy who didn't think to buy in during the biggest market boom since '29.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Idk if not having a 401k is a sign of normalcy.

It used to be pretty fucking normal until they got rid of all the pensions. That's what Tim's using for retirement instead of playing the ~~casino~~ stock market.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It used to be pretty fucking normal until they got rid of all the pensions.

And if we're getting a pension-friendly VP, I'm here for it. But I'm still waiting to see what a Harris/Walz economic policy looks like.

That’s what Tim’s using for retirement instead of playing the ~~casino~~ stock market.

My experience with pensions has mostly been through my parents/in-laws. And the experience I've had with pensions is that companies/governments can just kinda take them away again by pleading poverty during a period of historic economic expansion.

Again, I hope Tim's nomination implies a change in direction. But... we'll see.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
974 points (98.7% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3645 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS