109

I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Kiugessgt was good before they started listing all the ways humanity is doomed. I just can't watch it anymore.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 3 months ago

Don't worry! Technology can fix everything!

This video is sponsored by the Bill Gates Foundation.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Can't stand for this Melinda Gates erasure.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Special bronze sponsor by crowdstrike. Crowdstrike: we are proactive and won't let no virus or hacker take your system down if we can do it ourselves.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
109 points (91.6% liked)

science

14597 readers
17 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS