876
submitted 3 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 months ago

On what grounds would he be removed though? Is there a reason countries shouldn't select athletes that have been to prison?

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

All Olympic athletes sign a declaration saying they’ll strive to be a role model or something similar. I’d say a convicted rapist shouldn’t be considered a role model and therefore shouldn’t be allowed to compete.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

I get your point, but a convicted criminal who is rehabilitated could also be considered a good role model. Not saying he is, but not really a means to disqualify him.

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I thought the same when I wrote the comment. I’ve read a bit more about him and what he was charged with. In the UK he wasn’t convicted of grooming - they prosecuted him for it but he was found not guilty. I think it was a consensual relationship, but of course a 19 year old having sex with a 12 year old is rape regardless of consent in the UK and he was (rightly) convicted of that. In the Netherlands however the law is different, it wasn’t considered rape but something like “morally offensive actions”. So from the Dutch pov he’s not actually a rapist, which might explain why the Dutch Olympic committee don’t seem to think it’s that big a deal. Despite that, I still think a convicted pedophile rapist should not be allowed to compete in the games, but that needs to be made clear in the eligibility requirements by the IOC, rather than the wishy-washy “role model” contract.

[-] amanda@aggregatet.org 10 points 3 months ago

On the grounds that the Olympic Games is mostly a propaganda event and he’s absolutely terrible propaganda?

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Well on that same vein, the IOC unilaterally disqualifying a country's chosen athlete is likely to be even more politically problematic.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

The fact that he's a fucking child rapist. No need to be an apologist for the pedophile, he's a shit person and it's ok to call him that.

[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah but that's not really what my question was about.

Why shouldn't the Dutch delegation select him? And what rules would prevent a selection of any convicted criminal?

Or are we talking about the IOC specifically banning people convicted of child rape offences?

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Why shouldn’t the Dutch delegation select him? And what rules would prevent a selection of any convicted criminal?

Olympic athletes are representatives of their home country. Why the fuck would you pick a child rapist to be your representative? Were the cannibals unavailable or something?

Because olypians aren’t chosen based on the morality of their character but how much they excell at their sport (just like most major sports)

[-] ChronosTriggerWarning@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"We're totally fine being represented by rapists because we wanna win, godammit."

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
876 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2793 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS