24
submitted 1 month ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/evs@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/38397088

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

the real fear is that in some war scenario a country like China could flip a switch and turn millions of self driving cars into mass murder machines. they could even claim to have been hacked. the reality is that all of the self driving systems should be vetted like NASA level for security and robustness etc.. but of course that would slow development and raise costs to become uncompetitive.

can Elon Musk be trusted with everyones lives? can he prove it?

[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah maybe this would have made sense in... The 50's?

Everyone has nukes nowadays. If even one of these EV's is half as dangerous as a Tesla, I'm sure the army of american racists will ban them to hell and back.

And if things ever escalate, China loses their biggest golden goose, the american market, only hurting themselves in the process

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I think that the real fear is that the US would loose that manufacturing capability. Cars, and the technology/factories, to produce them are a pillar for both the US economy and military. Loosing that capability would be problematic for the US.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But what have legacy manufacturers done to keep that manufacturing capability? They have a long history of refusing to even consider EVs. They finally started after startups proved the technology and market, the government invested billions into the effort, but at the first hint of problems pulled back. Now we have the us government pushing around billions of dollars of protectionist cushion, liberally sprinkled with incentives in every direction, yet legacy automakers still can’t get serious about EVs.

I just know my brother works for a legacy automaker and completely buys the company line: EVs are unproven technology that no one wants or needs, and manufacturers can’t profit from. He’s happy they spent so much of their EV manufacturing incentives on flexible product lines so they can say they’re able to make EVs while going back to their traditional products

This is your chance: free money to build out EV manufacturing, protection from competition, market incentives to help with pricing, efficiency mandate whipping up a frenzy. You have a couple years to get your shit together and here comes Chinese companies to eat your lunch….. WHY DOES IT SEEM LIKE YOURE NOT EVEN TRYING

[-] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Like every other factory they've already pushed to cheap Chinese labour?

The only difference now is the label says "made and designed in China" instead of the good ol patriotic "designed in California made in china"

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Electronics yeah, but I think most vehicles are made/assembled in Nothern America. https://allamerican.org/research/auto-manufacturing-report/ that's a more complicated look, but does show that US cars are not predominantly Chinese (at least right now).

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay, then just write it into law that "China can sell cars in the US, but those cars don't have the capability to do x," (in your case, be self-driving). No one is benefiting from a complete embargo on affordable EVs but the executives of Ford, GM, and Stellantis

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
24 points (87.5% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3120 readers
307 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS