this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
789 points (99.3% liked)

News

36043 readers
2965 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden delivered remarks from the Oval Office outlining his decision not to seek reelection, his first on-camera remarks since making that announcement on Sunday. In addition to explaining why he is ending his candidacy, he listed off his priorities for his remaining time as president.

“And I’m going to call for Supreme Court reform, because this is critical to our democracy,” Biden said.

Multiple outlets have reported that Biden is considering proposals to establish term limits for Supreme Court justices and an enforceable ethics code for those on the high court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (4 children)

He should work on all of these:

Term limits for Supreme Court

Abolish Electoral college

Restrictions on corporate real estate investing

Forgive student loans

Restrictions on members of government trading stocks

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

He's been working on #4 pretty consistently at least

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What's the average amount of student loan forgiveness that students have received? Do you think it is more or less than a months rent?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately blanket student loan forgiveness keeps getting blocked by republicans in congress or judges they've appointed. They've only been able to provide relief to those who need it most. I know I haven't gotten any. But that's why average isn't a great metric to use here-- I don't need it, others do. Not to mention, average in terms of what-- absolute monetary value? Proportion of money received compared to total loan balance? Compared to original loan balance before interest?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because I'm bored though, I'll humor you.

Total direct loan forgiveness (not counting repayment pauses during covid or other relief measures): $167 billion

Total US outstanding student loan debt: $1.77 trillion

Total US outstanding student loan borrowers: 42.8 million

Average student loan debt per outstanding borrower: ~$40k (same source as above)


Total percentage of debt cancelled: 167m/1770m = 9.4%

Average debt relief per person: $3,900 (!)

So yes, it's paid for multiple months worth of rent, and relieved about 10% of everyone's debt on average! Better than I expected.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The first two of those will require constitutional amendments. That's a years-long process.

[–] bestagon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago. The second best time is today.

They need to get on it!

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 7 points 2 years ago

Hopefully Kamala would continue that process

[–] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not really. There's a popular vote interstate compact that is designed to bypass a constitutional amendment. Basically, the law says that once enough states agree to it, meaning to total electoral votes reaches 270, their votes go for whichever candidate won the popular vote.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am well familiar with that one, but that is a state-level endeavor, and I'm not sure that Biden, as a federal office-holder, should be involved in that.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 years ago

He could encourage states to join

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

There's already a state-level effort on #2 that's pretty far along: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Ranked choice voting in all national elections.

Electoral districts by GIS hexagon mapping.

NTRA, National Railroad Trackage Rights Act, which allows any railroad to run on any other railroad's trackage and service any customer to promote competition.

Death penalty for any self-identified religious person violating any rule in their religion.

1 million dollar fine for each falsehood or misleading statement on broadcast media, including entertainment and drama. Normalizing lying has to stop.

All theft and burglary convictions, including white collar, require making whole of all consequences to the victims instead of incarceration.

National Police Registry (NPR) for all enforcement personnel.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

That’s a wild list haha. You’re a dreamer.

Regarding RCV, it has to happen at the state level. I support that tho