166
Generative AI is a climate disaster (techwontsave.us)
submitted 5 months ago by UnseriousAcademic@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The cost of simply retrieving an answer from the Web is infinitely smaller than the cost of generating a new one.

Great interview with Sasha Luccioni from Huggingface on all the ways that using generative AI for everything is both a) hugely costly compared to existing methods, and b) insane.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Tech could save us, but not AI. The tech that could isn't profitable enough to do so, though, so it's not happening. And it's not like oil corp. shareholders & execs are gonna accept a pay cut so that their subsidies could be redirected to more ecologically sustainable tech. Nope, we live in capitalist hell. At least, until we don't.

[-] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 5 months ago

I'm cheered that we now have so much wind and solar wanting to come online that it's straining grid interconnects so countries (US and NL for example) suddenly have to spend a bundle on infra so that the power can get across continents to where it's needed

this is a very cool problem to have: oh no! we have too much new clean energy!

it may not be sufficient, but it's an excellent start

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
166 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1489 readers
52 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems