Oh no!
wewbull
joined 2 years ago
More capacity to process rape kits is something I can get behind. More evidence is good. It would stop people clamouring for convictions based on accusations alone.
I see. EVs have much more incentive to minimise inefficiencies. Yes.
They don't, but they think they do.
Turing theories and papers were pre-war. It's those that people remember him for.
It was 1941, and not seen as valuable by the Germans.
The British built Collosus in 1943 and used it for code breaking.
The Z3 was relay based in 1941. (Germans)
Collosus was 1943 and based on valves. (British)
The Harvard MK1 was in 1944. (Americans)
There was a lot of parallel development going on at the time, all converging on solutions.
Since EVs are much more limited by inefficiencies...
I don't follow?
Between charges and a trial is a criminal investigation. If that doesn't give enough reason to proceed to trial, charges are dropped.
A better stat would be %age of accusations that result in an investigation. That should be a lot higher, but police shouldn't be trying to prosecute cases that have nothing but an accusation to court.
You think Epstein hasn't been investigated?
She needs to be fired. She's a banking stooge, not a chancellor.
view more: next ›
The 2008 banking crisis was different IMHO. A banking collapse would have bankrupted millions of people in the UK. They then imposed rules requiring the banks to restructure to make sure customer banking is isolated from investment banking. The intent being to try to make sure they can be allowed to fail next time.
What Reeves is trying to stop happening now is exactly what those regulations were designed to allow happen. Financial institutions feel the consequences of their own actions.