[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, it's more about finding open minded people with empathy (and be open minded and empathic ourself) more than finding people just like us. Embracing differences, respecting and understanding eachother is key. There are plenty of people out there who keep their kids to themself and have plenty of other interests, it's easier to meet them if we don't push them away in the first place (just like they don't push us way fro being child free).

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

it is not such a stretch. according to Oxford dictionary, to throw is :

1.propel (something) with force through the air by a movement of the arm and hand.

which is a very human concept. We then can not judge other species ability to do it (exept primates). just like we can not say animals don't have languages because thay don't speak english.

2.send suddenly into a particular state or condition.

The archer fish is then very efficient at sending water into a particular state or condition with high accuracy.

the octopus for exemple has been observed throwing stuff around.

edit : elephants do it to. and you can find plenty of bird examples.

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

you're actually the only one answering the question hahaha, thanks, that makes sens !

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 year ago

If you are somewhere for work then you're probably not on your own and your employer could offer some form of common transportation so you don't rely on your own car (and foundings) to get your task done.

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking the same ... thanks for tje support, they're only strangers on the internet though, no worries :)

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

all right :) fairly quickly : train lines, bus lines, footpaths and cycle paths. hubs of public transport, where people can get from their place cycling or walking (or in the worst case senario driving) to get a bus/train/tram/... to where they need to go. Room for bycicle is important (in the trains, buses, etc) so people can keep on traveling easily whem they get to their destination (and small rental cars for the few who can't cycle or walk). Thisins not a revolutionary idea, it's been real before we developed all our infrastructure and life around cars.

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 1 year ago

bro you don't know me hahaha

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

who's aggressive here ?

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org -5 points 1 year ago

I agree with the first statement. The answer for the least harfull option is easy though : if you currently are dependent on cars (a lot of people think they are but really aren't, they are just lazy), get the smallest, most reliable second hand car you can find. Buying any thing new is just feedind the capitalist beast that the car industry is. If you choose to live in such a remote place that any form of public transportation would be "wasting a ton of resources driving around a vehicle with no one in it" then you are on you own.

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

the least harmfull car is public transport. we should be discussing how to make this accessible instead.

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

99% of cars are not needed. Everyone should be able to go on with their life without it. Every car dependent situation could not be. Instead of saying cars are ok because I need one right now" that is fallacious, we should be asking "how can we change things so we don't need it anymore ?". Fuck all cars

[-] weshgo@lemmy.sdf.org -3 points 1 year ago

There is still way too much car on this pictures.

1
1
1
Nerry for nat geo (www.youtube.com)

A classic short film to attract some divers around here :)

1
Triturus marmoratus (lemmy.sdf.org)

Triturus marmoratus or Marbled newt, India ink and watercolour. by me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

weshgo

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF