It doesn't help that he talks nearly in allegory.

It's hard to point at one thing because often what he says is indirect and implied. When you call him out on it, he says "I didn't say that."

Assuming you're actually interested in his rhetorical techniques and not just a Stan trolling, the podcast "Decoding the Gurus" did a few episodes on him. In the first episode, I'd say they even came down with a positive assessment of him! But they talk about his ability to speak in pseudo-profound bullshit and how it shields him from direct criticism like you're asking for.

The article doesn't whiff on this, it lays out why it's too expensive.

1. The strategy was to replace gas cars with EV 1-to-1 to solve the climate crisis and save the car industry.
2. Gas cars have gotten bigger over the years because of marketing, bravado, "safety", and regulation-skirting.
3. EV-makers have largely bought into that and made all these huge EVs.
4. Huge EVs require bigger batteries which are more expensive in raw materials and manufacturing.
5. Huge batteries are heavy and dangerous.
6. Range anxiety has encouraged even more oversized batteries on already oversized cars.
7. Huge batteries are the main source of cost, meaning EVs end up being a luxury.

So, yes--they are too damn expensive, however a vehicle that meets our actual needs wouldn't be, if it existed in North America.

The headline was the tip of the iceberg. What a fascinating article. Jumps from homosexuality is "unnatural" to it somehow eroding the foundations of our democracy!

Favorite unhinged quote:

Homosexual relationships are inherently unnatural… ultimately harmful and costly for everyone.

I want "ultimately harmful and costly for everyone" on a t-shirt.

I've had it at my job for a year and a half, it started after the Great Resignation took like half of our good staff.

The main problem is that it's used as a scapegoat against any other improvement, e.g. hiring more folks, paying more wages, better benefits. Granted, I'd choose 4dww above a lot of those things, but it doesn't feel nice that there's a threat to lose it.

I did not see the last sentence of your comment coming. Caught me by surprise.

You can edit the title. Maybe

Signal fights disinformation about fake zero-day vulnerability

Inaction against intolerance is a form of action, is it not? "Bee kind" is not just a call to not be mean, it's a call to act in kindness.

I believe the poster is probably right in that it stirs more toward fostering acceptance rather than simply ignoring hate.

It's not compelled speech, per se—Beehaw users need to have an active role in order to make it the kind of place people want to bee.

My hot take, I feel like federation is almost not worth it for beehaw. It's billed as a place where folks will be(e) kind with each other yet some rando can walk in from the street and start slinging garbage without care. I know mods could intervene but sometimes the line is not clear and there's nothing stopping that person from creating another account on limitless instances.

This change is also bad news for America as a whole: Participation in a religious community generally correlates with better health outcomes and longer life, higher financial generosity, and more stable families—all of which are desperately needed in a nation with rising rates of loneliness, mental illness, and alcohol and drug dependency.

This is the problem statement of the article. Seems like we could push for systems that address these issues without the belief in a puppet master in the sky as a prerequisite.

And maybe an anticar community while we're at it 🙈

I love how sassy The Verge's coverage of reddit is.

This aged well https://www.fastcompany.com/3012870/evernotes-quest-to-become-a-100-year-old-startup