swlabr

joined 2 years ago
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

recent and rare, tbh. cries in FTTN

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

The clanker is nowhere near autonomous and requires a human operator to both a) generate any sort of functionality and b) generate training data so that one day the clanker can learn servitude on its own. To own this, you gotta be enough of a creep to let people record the inside of your home and use it to train a product. I don’t see this process happening without the operators seeing some sick shit. BYOG, basically (be your own goatse)

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s true, the french are no fans of computer glasses.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago

Zitron was a blogger now, doing enjoyable bloggy things like hanging rude epithets on CEOs and antagonizing the normie tech media. Kevin Roose and Casey Newton, the hosts of the New York Times’ relatively bullish Hard Fork podcast, quickly became prime targets. They’re too friendly with their subjects, says Zitron, who called Hard Fork a case study in journalists using “their power irresponsibly.” He recalls having pitched Newton once in his capacity as a flack, but nothing came of it. Newton, for his part, remembers meeting Zitron somewhere, maybe a decade ago, and Zitron saying something like, “I would really like to be friends.” Nothing came of that, either.

I will choose to read this as: newton mad that they arent pals with zitron

TBH I am neutral on zitron. I don’t read his stuff on the reg, just when it pops up here and I feel like it. We all belong to the same hypocrisy. If he’s pushed AI companies before through his PR firm, that sucks.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 9 points 1 month ago

thanks for asking. ~~No~~ of course

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just pretend that it’s coming from a different root word “mocratize” meaning the opposite of whatever the fuck crypto is doing

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oreo has shoved 40 million in wads of cash between two sloppy biscuits. You see, if they don’t do it, then Hydrox is gonna partner with DeepSeek. This is just business, it’s not a bubble

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 6 points 1 month ago

That has to be intentionally bad.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Found out about a new space junk startup today.

One bold new startup is looking to cash in on the frenzy with a particularly bizarre approach: a massive array of space mirrors meant to reflect the Sun’s light down to paying subscribers.

The company has yet to launch any of the 4,000 satellite mirrors it sold in its far-out pitch. However, the startup recently applied for a license with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to launch a 60-by-60 foot demo craft in April of 2026, Space.com reported this week. That’s after winning a $1.25 million contract from the US Air Force, of all places, on top of a $20 million Series A funding round to build out its “sunlight on demand” service, which Reflect says will “strengthen the national defense of the United States of America.”

Astronomers, however, aren’t so gung-ho about the idea of a massive space mirror blinding the Earth with Sunlight.
“The reflectors will be directing their light [even after they pass their target] because obviously they can’t shut that off,” John Berentine, an astronomer at the Silverado Hills Observatory told Space.com. “The beam reflected by these satellites is very intense, four times brighter than the full moon, and they will be flying multiple satellites in a formation. That will have an effect on wildlife in the directly illuminated area, but also, through atmospheric scattering, on the surrounding areas as well.”

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

For sale: lenovo thinkpad, lightly used

-Earnest Hempingway

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

as a bonus, it’s also fascist!

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Before I knew that they were called skeets, I was mentally calling them “bluesks”. So maybe “blasks?” Btw these are intentionally bad, so spare your critiques.

view more: ‹ prev next ›