Do you have evidence to support the claim that European elections are being rigged?
strung6387
It is in the best interests of the parties to put forward candidates and policies who will have voter appeal, in order to prevail over competing parties.
The USA is not a healthy democracy.
Sometimes policy issues arise after an election cycle, in which case the voters didn't have an opportunity to vote for or against the candidates based on their position on the policy issue. Was that the case with age verification in the UK?
In a healthy democracy, future elections decide the fate of these policies, which can be reverted. Even the USA's complete prohibition on recreational alcohol, which was popular with voters at the time, and codified into the constitution itself, later became unpopular with voters, and was repealed. So as long as the democracy remains healthy, there is always an opportunity for bad policies to be repealed.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
This is a great start, but this one is showing its age, and could use an update.
I'm glad that you're happy with it, but you couldn't pay me to use a Xiaomi product.
At the risk of sounding like an out of touch janny, what's a janny?
It never occurred to me that a government would pay a funeral home, but now that I think about it, it makes perfect sense for a government to collectively pay for the disposal of human remains, since everyone needs it, and it can't be abused.
What does SLT mean?
I'd argue the opposite: satire and humor are the best way to get people on your side and motivated.
There's no conspiracy of collusion between parties. Any party is free to put forward candidates who favor popular policies. And if that candidates wins, but doesn't fulfill their promises, then the voters will remember that.