At least where I live the laws are such that publishers can claim copyrights only after they added their "editor" customizations such as publisher logos, page numbers, layout changes etc.

The manuscript that you/the scientist wrote and handed in to the publisher is free of that, the publisher cannot claim any rights at that state. So you always have the right to publish the "unedited" manuscript anywhere including researchgate, arxiv, your website etc.

That's just not possible, game data is not image data. For example image compression is lossy and based on quadtree representations etc., how would you apply this to code and sprites?

There was a report some time that they use RC plane turbines in their drones. Imagine you're running a small nerdy business for RC plane parts when you suddenly get a big order for turbines from Ukraine.

Russia is doomed if they can't even manage to protect these.

Nobody mentioned udm14.com ?

Well yes, but the end result after driving unattended in traffic for a while is the same still, that's the point. You could argue that a FSD Tesla makes it a bit further, I guess that's true but still it's far from what Elon was selling to the people.

That argument is stupid. My robot lawn mower "can drive itself" but it can't follow traffic rules and would crash after a while if set to drive on its own in a road. Just as a Tesla. What Musk was implying was "it can drive itself without violating traffic rules and causing crashes" and clearly it can't.

Ich bin vielleicht nicht auf dem aktuellsten Stand aber ich bin mir sicher die Inhalte sind nicht weg. Und die Inhalte sind ein Problem, das sage ich als jemand der mit ungefiltertem Internet aufgewachsen ist damals als es z.B. rotten.com gab. Zu der Zeit war das Internet vielleicht wirklich ein neues Medium und meine Eltern hatten das Bewusstsein für die Probleme nicht. Meinen Kindern will ich das aber gerne ersparen. Ich will ja aber nicht für Altersverifikation im Internet argumentieren sondern sehe die Eltern in der Pflicht die "vor dem Internet" auf dem Endgerät vorsorgen oder einfach Kinder erst mit dem Internet konfrontieren wenn die geistige Reife es zulässt.

Finde ich gut, eine absolut wasserdichte technische Lösung gibt es aber glaube ich nicht. Wenn es anonym ist und keine identifizierbaren Infos enthält findet sich jemand der seine eigenen Tokens verkauft oder einfach so herausgibt. Und es gibt das Thema Identitätsdiebstahl. Wenn Leute es schaffen z.B. auf fremden Namen Bankkonten zu eröffnen wird sich zur Tokenerzeugung bestimmt auch ein Weg eröffnen. Am Ende bleiben immer die Eltern in der Pflicht.

I think there are some interesting aspects to this. First, is the info about french and british personell being active in Ukraine actually new? I think I remember reading about this quite often already some time ago but I don't have any sources right now. Then the second one is, that shortly before the leak Scholz gave yet another explanation on why he doesn't want to send taurus and it was actually quite a lenghty and detailed interview that was also pretty big in the media, in germany at least. And basically his arguments were that taurus requires german personell in ukraine which is too risky. But what's said in the call actually contradicts this, the generals at one point discuss that with some training ukrainians could handle taurus on their own. So that's good to know but also makes me wonder if the purpose of the leak was also to somehow hurt Scholz?

Well a good share goes back that's true, but certainly not everything. I mean the plants could've also built school busses and ambulances instead of military vehicles, right? I was just pointing out that "no downsides" is a bit optimistic, the costs are very real. And it is a pity that in this day and age we still have to put up with that 🙁

I mean I can see why it is necessary but the downside obviously is less money for social programs and improving peoples lifes. I guess we can thank Putin for that 🙁