shreditdude0

She's clearly a proponent of American imperialism and chauvinism, which isn't out of character for Social Democrats, who are known capitalist sympathizers and reformists. What does this mean for the PSL? What is the word among the actual members of the party? Specifically, the revolutionary Marxist hardliners? The Party is comprised of *leftists" and Marxists, and clearly, even those who retain capitalist sympathies if they go as far as platforming someone who supports American aggression against global South nations, especially AES countries. Is this enough to abandon the party in its entirety or would it be a wake-up call for leadership to come to terms with this glaring vulnerability and address a clear danger to the Marxist, revolutionary elements of the party?

Either way, critical support for all revolutionary efforts, especially in the West, were unmistakable proponents of the bourgeois order seem to always slither their way into Marxist circles. This is the danger of working closely with leftists. If they do not have a solid, unwavering, Marxist and dialectical materialist foundation, they cannot be held above suspicion of sympathizing with the enemy of the working people.

Everytime I hear or see an American talk about "how much is that going to cost us?", I straight up feel like strangling the life out of them. Everything's value, especially life, can only be measured in money. We live among barbarians.

I despise every last one of these military contracting corporations and ghouls that are its foundation and lifeline and create the tools that engulf the world in terror. Every last one of them deserves a cruel, miserable end.

Oh, but if only someone had warned the world about the perils it would be subjected to when capitalism finds itself imploding in on itself!

I always think of the amount of times revolutionaries were exiled to Siberia or otherwise imprisoned for revolutionary agitation. These people ain't about any of that. I guess calling my bourgeois senator will do the trick, though. That sure worked wonders the last time they directed everybody to do that!

These typical, Western "leftists" and their servility to the imperialists getting caught up on slinging their leftist buzzwords and doing their useless "purity" checks instead of doing actual, material analysis and real, on-the-ground work to improve people's lives. "Pragmatic socialist" this, "center-left blah blah blah" that, like, holy shit, these fools need to shut the hell up and go learn some dialectics and learn to do some actual, real-world work. That is, if they're not too busy being on the CIA's payroll. A bunch of useless, revisionist, counter-revolutionaries is what they are.

Critical support for the cancer in struggle against the Netanyahu plague of cells!

It's one of those words that I've learned to disassociate from as I've abandoned liberalism and all "ultra", uncritical or otherwise reactionary politics. I use the term Marxist-Leninist and I don't see how any terms like "leftist" or "right-wing" apply to it, since those words are incredibly dogmatic and pigeonholing. One chooses those labels and adopts all that those labels stand for without much thought. It makes it easy to "shut the brain off" and strictly delegate all choice and action to what rules are detailed under any of these politics.

The foundations of Leninism take concern with capitalism in its imperialist, global form, and, coupled with the dialectical materialist grounding of Marxism, tackles it and gives people the tools necessary to gain an understanding of their realities under its hegemony and rule, so that they learn to think and resolve challenges in overthrowing its many fetters and contradictions.

Ultras love disparaging all existing socialist experiments almost as much as the imperialists and their reactionaries instead of understanding that they share a great, common enemy. They're more concerned with whether a country is following Marxism as a doctrine or "holy scripture" to a tee; if they're not, they throw their hands up and say "they're not worth it, they're revisionists". They're perfectly content abandoning these countries and their people in their struggle against the forces of imperialism and all of the terrors that we know it's capable of.

They don't "think" in a dialectically materialist way, and this has allowed them to be deposed and stuck in their tracks time and time again by agents working on behalf of the bourgeois order. They demonstrate that they're not willing to struggle against, at the very least, the contradictions within their very own organizations and cadres or address issues in a good faith, selfless manner. They're not willing to learn or advance beyond their book reading, which is a critical error. For fear of "betraying" the label of "leftism" and all of the static tenets of whatever flavor of leftism they ascribe to, they abandon reason, prudence, selflessness, science, and the international struggle, at large.

When one becomes more familiar with the dialectical materialist process of scrutinizing, analyzing, understanding the world and its phenomena, these terms like "leftism" become nothing more than set backs and impediments to the necessary development of the individual and their class into revolutionaries capable of challenging the bourgeois order, its many systems and proponents, and destroying them to make way for the dictatorship of the proletarian.

In short, leftism has such rigid, dogmatic "rules". It focuses more on preserving the label and membership in these factions that it serves as nothing more than a set back for people in developing the dialectical materialist Marxist worldview necessary to face struggles, adapt to challenges, learn from losses, and ultimately, achieve wins.

Ask them to elaborate. What's their proof of hedonism being the culprit for it?

Sometimes, I wish the US would undergo some "liberation" á la Carpet Bombing just so that these fucks could get a real-life taste of what millions have been subjected to abroad and are now forced to live with the memory of massacred family members and friends.

Oh, I hope they pump those numbers up!

B-But who would sit in traffic for two hours commuting to and from an office that nobody wanted to work in in the first place??? We can't destroy such a beautiful, cultural work environment like this!