Let me know how "gain of function" research is different than using plasmids. I'll wait.
rusticus
joined 2 years ago
Nature is the most highly regarded scientific publication in the world. I can't help you with your paywall issues.
Both. "All sequence data, wild type virus, and previous research history" refers to the disease causing virus and wild type relatives. The Wuhan research viruses are unrelated to SARS-CoV-2.
Lol. ANY molecular biology research involves plasmids, which is the prime example of "gain of function". It's the cornerstone of molecular genetics for the last 40 years.
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(21)00991-0 https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/250304/1/250304.pdf
You are out of your league dude. Stop spreading lies.
For which degree?
other corroborating reports with references
A YouTube video and an opinion piece lol. How about a Nature article?
Gain of function research is the cornerstone of molecular biology. WTF are you talking about. Again, your ignorance is glaringly obvious.
Your concern is not valid to a competent molecular biologist because it’s not relevant biologically.
Okay you’ve refused to acknowledge or read my more important points so it appears you don’t want a conversation with perseverations on your agenda. Good luck.
All of your comments are naive and ignorant and have no factual basis. In fact, I’ve pointed out specific quotes in your own references that prove you completely wrong which you have refused to acknowledge.
No I’m not buying you brand. Your specific concern is unwarranted.
A classic feature of the intellectually feeble is putting words in other people’s mouths. Tell us what gain of function means.