What options have you tried that you find half-baked?
When I’m not in the mood for gdb’s CLI/TUI, I often use KDbg, Nemiver, or just good old CodeBlocks.
roflo1
joined 2 months ago
I do that very often. I’ve found that people’s expressions are a lot less “stiff” that way.
Edit: it’s entirely possible I started doing it after I read this comic for the first time.
Funny. I actually prefer the plastic reels. I feel like the metal ball bearings (not present in the only metallic reel I ever owned) do all of the hard work for me.
Maybe it’s just what I got used to?
I’m intrigued.
Do you recall something in particular?
FWIW, I usually just connect to a ssh location from within Nautilus.
I’ll try to explain it in another way. First, let’s talk about “semantics”:
Usually we assume that a tarball contains multiple files, and a gz is a single file compressed.
So a .tar.gz file is a single tarball that has been compressed.
A .gz.tar is understood to be a tarball containing a single gzipped file. But if that’s indeed what the file is, it doesn’t make much sense to tar it in the first place.
Moving on to what you really want to accomplish: you can certainly create many gz files and tar them, but we wouldn’t call it a .gz.tar file since tar doesn’t care about the format of the included files. Much like a bunch of compressed PDFs aren’t named .pdf.tar
Also, I’d like to point out that neither tarballs nor gzipped files are optimized for modifying.
I’d guess more like gopher