[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If its their content he should just be able to reupload the clips.

122
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Of course i'm not saying internet users have to use it. Or that it has to completely replace Youtube or other streaming services in its complete entirety.

Here is why internet users should start using Peertube, no matter how much or less they use it than Youtube. Simply letting them know it exists is key.

Peertube is essentially an interface with a varying amount of instances hosted by volunteers that all build up the bigger Peertube federated service with all the videos. Unlike alternatives this makes it more likely to be around long term.

it has the highest chance of other video user generated content services being around for years to come due to being federated. If Youtube shuts down good bye to alot of that years worth of content. If a peertube instance closes down only a smaller portion of videos would be lost, but that doesn't close down the entire program because all the other instances in theory would still be feferated.

It's open source meaning less chance of seeing ads on or by videos when not using an ad blocker. Donations are always encouraged to help fund the servers. But not required.

Summary:

  1. longer lasting due to being federated even while making less profits.

  2. Peertube is open source.

  3. Donations are welcome but not required just to use the services usually.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It might seem too late, but this will be helpful for people stuck in ridiculous contracts to cancel and go internet exclusive. If you're younger, in your 20s or even 30s, you would probably likely be rid of cable by now.

if you're much older then that those are the people I think would really benefit from this, the older generations.

145

Sometimes these fees could cost as much as an entire billing session even if you hadn't used it for that long of a period of time, (in the u.s)

34
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I feel most peertube users would not care. But is it legal, or a chance that some one might sue?

edit: added claritiy to the question title and post body.

Peertube is an open source platform where I feel most users are posting there just to have fun and as a hobby for no or little profit. While Youtube is ad supported and creators on there now days want to use it to make profit.

On Peertube should it be legally acceptable to download uploaded videos for free for offline use? Is it legally acceptable?

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 16 points 10 months ago

I don't think it's really changed, maybe it's just your perception of it. It's just as addictiv today as it was last year as I see it.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 14 points 10 months ago

It's optimal to them. You just don't understand Youtube's perspective of it yet. And then it's unoptimal for them when you watch with the adblocker.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 7 points 10 months ago

That's a way to look at, but i'l personally still be using Peertube. instead of 3rd party YouTube apps.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 18 points 10 months ago

in the short term they work, but YouTube can cut those 3rd party apps access at any time for any reason. Use Peertube for the better long term.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 7 points 10 months ago

Yeah be like me and just use Peertube, I don't even notice this stuff untill people complain about it haha.

182
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

This delay isn't exclusive to Firefox, it's in any browser where a user has enabled adblockers including in Chrome. Disable the adblocker and this delay magically go away. This was done on purpose.

10

When I go on one instance there doesn't seem to be a change of interface or even a special about from the maintainer. Is there anything behind the scenes that changes?

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you have a deep history with gmail then that could make it harder to to replace. It's very true especially if from important positions you participated in, along with multiple accounts on it which I like to call leaving eggs all in one basket since they are all reliant on that account.

For people who arent quiet as invested in that, and just use it casually which is a pretty big percent could easily replace gmail with nothing to lose and those are the type of users I was thinking about when writing up this post. But I can agree with what you are saying here and that you have a good point.

34
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Gmail is an email service. Like the fediverse, email is federated.

By changing your email provider, do you really lose anything? You can still contact your friends, contacts and even various customer suports. You also can recieve emails from popular social media apps. If you degoogle from atleast one Google app, maybe Gmail could be the easiest and least life changing one.

While, Youtube could easilly be one of the most difficult to degoogle from. Not like literally but emotionally. Like deep down you know you can find mostly all you might need on something like Peertube but not all the entertainment media like on Youtube. You will also become a social outcast if peertube is the only app you use. You might not understand channels people mention in day to day talk from youtube or references.

If you use exclusively fediverse apps and sites, Chrome could be almost just as easy to replace as gmail, longterm. However If you use Youtube it won't surprise me that Youtube downgrades your performance and user experience in what ever means neccesary on competing browsers.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 22 points 10 months ago

People all this stress can be avoided if more channels upload videos on peertube. U block origin wouldnt even be needed as generally no ads are on peertube.

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

pff, just power the PC off completely, that'l put it to sleep. Don't trust that windows actually powers it off? Unplug the thing! While you are at it power off that phone of yours completely, that'l put the annoying notifications sounds and buzzing to rest.

177

A Quinnipiac University poll asked U.S. registered voters to select one of four options to blame for the divisions in the country. Overall, 35 percent blamed social media, 32 percent blamed political leaders, 28 percent blamed cable news channels and only 1 percent blamed other countries.

4
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/lifeprotips@lemmy.ml

I know people who spend like $2.00 or 3.00 and get only like 30 bags at other stores and even when it is only 1.00 it's likely to be less then the 100 green tea bags that got for $1.25.

post edits: just some spell corrections

11
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by rob299@bookwormstory.social to c/newpipe@lemmy.ml

When I use it i'l generally use It on one of my phones.

Why don't I subscribe to YouTube channels on New pipe? Well one day Youtube might revoke my access to it's content entirely using newpipe. They don't like new pipe blocking the ads.

So I would go on sepia search in a separate browser window, this will make searching for videos on Peertube more broad then on an actual instance. and when I find a good channel you just need to copy the URL to that channel page and then you can subscribe to multiple channels from different instances as if it were normal Youtube channels.

If I'm on my laptop or smart tv, then that's when i'd use youtube. to keep up with trends, we know how that can be like. right? or is it just me?

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Want to know why they might really be saying to not sideload apps, because they are saying without saying it "screw you epic games, screw you 3rd party YouTube clients that get rid of our ads and screw you f-droid for offering something to people for free that isn't piracy, now we have to compete with that and make good products, or do we mwahaha."

[-] rob299@bookwormstory.social 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

oh oh. a new tech war is coming for independant app developers.

I hope this doesn't lead to Google to keep saying this repeativly for awhile and eventually removing the feature to side loading apps in the feature, them saying saying something like 'sideloading an old outdated way we use to use the internet and it has security flaws'

They really just want to kill f-droid. Once they do that, it gets harder to block Youtube ads after all. Apps like new pipe would have to find a new home.

Are devs people going to wake up and make a new commercial os that will actual compete with android and iOS? no a new Linux distro is not going to come anywhere close to even, Macos marketshare. It needs to be new, and needs to be preloaded on computers and sell in stores. It needs to be simple.

view more: next ›

rob299

joined 10 months ago