pieguy

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Which albums you got there?

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 hours ago

I made this content low-calorie just so you could consume it, because I remember that time you said you were on a diet and couldn't consume content anymore! Do my efforts mean nothing to you?!?!

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Thank you for engaging with my content!

What are your predictions for act five?

 

You can find the other acts here.

The thrilling act five will be posted some time next week, followed by the epilogue on World Potato Day!

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

the computer

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

I don't know if a brief mention of computers necessitates my commenting of "the computer", so to play it safe:

the computer

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Be the heat to my sink

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 22 hours ago

I missed this :')

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is he gonna be okay?

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 day ago

the computer

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This reminds me: When the instance first went down, I was worried that it might've been qrstuv uploading the highly anticipated sequel to the "It's Hank!" series that filled the storage!

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

it's a fucking christmas miracle

[–] pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
 
 

Based on a content by @pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org

 
 

Miss the previous instalments? Find them here: Act One, Act Two

 
40
it's pi day (pieguy.sdf.org)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/funhole@lemmy.sdf.org
 

You are legally required to consume some form of pie today.

 

episode 1 of idk how many yet (this may be the only one, you never know!)

 

I am filing a class action suit on behalf of over 206 individuals against the moderator of /c/modabuse @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org for inconsistently enforcing rule 1 (no victim blaming).

EXHIBIT A: Moderator log showing instances where people received punishment for violating rule 1.

EXHIBIT B: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org quite explicitly violates rule 1 the first time.

EXHIBIT C: In which @notwesker@lemmy.sdf.org merely warns @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org instead of applying a ban as done previously for far less explicit cases of a rule 1 violation.

EXHIBIT D: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org threatens to repeat the act of violating rule 1.

EXHIBIT E: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org explicitly violates rule 1 a SECOND time.

EXHIBIT F: In which @pieguy@lemmy.sdf.org explicitly violates rule 1 a THIRD time.

As restitution for the damages we are seeking:

If you would like to register as a claimant on this class action suit, please leave a subcomment here indicating such and what you request as your restitution.

 
view more: next ›