pc486

For content, here in California we do have ebike classifications that are a little more detailed than pedals means bicycle. There are three classes, and the fastest (class 3) are not legal for middle school ages. We even have a law on the books that makes it illegal to sell ebikes that can be software/app changes into a different class.

This really is a push to outlaw all ebikes, especially since the resp is from Orinda. They hate bikes there, even regular push bikes.

Being dark isn't a choice. People, dogs, cats, birds, etc are born that way.

Even clothing sometimes isn't a choice. It's pretty common in work attire to require black shoes and slacks. Formal attire also leans dark.

Walking and biking are great. I highly recommend trying one out and there are adult classes if you'd like help learning how to ride and operate a bicycle. A good, used bike with a bike rack can do wonders carrying things around. As a bonus they're cheap to maintain and safe to work on, completely unlike wrenching underneath a heavy car.

Depending on your situation, you may want to consider a moped. They're generally easy to get licensed for, often don't require insurance, and costs about the same as a good e-bike. They require the same skills as riding a bike (knowing the road laws, understanding how to stop effectively, counter-leaning, etc). The bonus is you'll be able to get up to speed on frontage and other roads that may not be safe to ride a pedal bike on (e.g. roads without any shoulder). Of course you can always do both, like starting with a pedal bike to get a feeling of how to ride a two-wheeled device.

If one bike is good, two must be better. Right?

That's because they legally have to. Land owners with appropriative water rights must use their water or they lose access to it, forever. Flooding a low value field is the logical thing to do, even if it's an unreasonable thing to do.

It has been like this for more than a hundred years because we have two different legal systems for water rights: riparian rights and appropriative rights. Until we get that mess sorted (a very tall order), some land owners will be able to pull free water while some cities will struggle to buy water or water rights.

Involuntary manslaughter doesn't require premeditation or planning.

The driver was charged with misdemeanor death by motor vehicle. That's a special section of law for killing by car, and it's far too lenient. North Carolina has laws on involuntary manslaughter they're not charged with.

The problem with explaining away the light sentence is that we have laws to make accidental killing by car OK, but accidental killing by any other method is not. That's not justice as it's neither fair nor equitable.

This driver should be in jail for 1 to 3 years as laid out in North Carolina's involuntary manslaughter code.

I like the intent but your proposal is narrow and will face many challenges. I suggest instead advocating for rezoning R1 zones into R2, R3 and higher. This has a strong movement behind it (YIMBYs) and has a simple and popular message of "we need more housing, so let's build it." As a consequence you'll get builders constructing housing without long setbacks, single-unit parking garages, etc.

Sean Dunn was charged with a misdemeanor, which doesn't require injury to the agent. This is the most minor crime possible of federal assault, and the jury acquitted him.

Dunn committed no crime.

Can they make it $300 per car, please? Use the extra funds to run free busses.

What really makes me angry about this is around 35% of Americans rent. That's a third of people who have no ability to avoid the rapid increase in electricity costs. And I have no idea just how many with their own house have the capital, or legal ability (HOAs), to install solar.

Good luck with your solar install. Signed, a grid tied user with $0.56/kwh power.