[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Probably, but none that I'd actually invest my own time and effort into. I was just making an offhand observation, not starting an investigation.

The furthest I might be willing to go, would be to provide some constructive criticism, but I'd even have to mull that over i.e. weigh the risk I'm just helping fine-tune a LLM model, for free...so...yeah...

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago

I genuinely can't tell if you're an elaborate troll, LLM, or just autistic.

I don't mean any of those as an insult, just to say that you have a very distinct prose that really comes through when you write more than a sentence, or two.

Given your post history, I'm leaning towards LLM, but I'm open to being wrong.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

It was more succinct than pointing out each individual logical fallacy.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Confused? Yandex it.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Who's verbose now?

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

"stop using words that make me look stupid"

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago

Amazing. You're really something special. Have you tried staring at goats?

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Alright chucklefuck, pointing out that one whiney dick is throwing a tantrum has no logical bearing on the labor movement writ large, or my support of it.

Like I said, next level irony in your projection.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

The irony in your projection is next level.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago

Pointing out the lack of context and the tantrum like behavior isn't nuance. The fact that you think otherwise makes me concerned for your ability to safely cross the street.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

passntrash

joined 6 months ago