There was a situation where there were two sets of identical twins born at the same hospital at the same time, and somehow one of each got swapped. Each mismatched pair grew up thinking they had a non-identical twin and only found out about the mix-up later in life.
Maybe they wouldn't have found out at all if both were swapped. Food for thought.
There's a certain group of old men, many of whom happen to be running certain countries, whose EOL - natural or otherwise - I'll be relieved to see, but the fear is that there are plenty of (relatively) young men with similar ideals waiting in the wings, ready to take the reins when the old guard is gone.
Note that I'm not wishing them dead per se, but no-one lives forever. Not even them.
The war would be over if Putin just took his troops out of Ukraine immediately and indefinitely. Even Trump can grasp that concept. It's not hard at all.
But Putin won't because he's too far into a delusion that was first one of grandeur but has become one of sunk cost.
Trump might be able to grasp that too, but I'm not sure that his mind wouldn't then immediately reject it because its roots are in qualities he admires in himself and others.
My first thought was that this was arranging to put fish in a barrel, to allude to a certain metaphor, but then I realised that it was more likely the other way around and it's a concentration camp, and your comment was already here.
And then I remembered how camps usually go and that it would be both at the same time.
Anonymity on the Internet is about as strong as the lock on your door. A sufficiently motivated individual will be straight through it with barely a thought.
At present? Keeping an eye on Russian ships "just out for a walk" so to speak, in waters nowhere near their immediate interests that happen to be a lot closer to British interests.
Why does that need to be a jet? To remind those ships that if they were to bring their own jets for whatever reason, not that they'd ever even have the remotest possibility of the merest inkling of a thought to do such a thing, we'd be prepared.
Mild sabre rattling. Also known as "international diplomacy".
Y'know if I was the exec of a bloodsucking electricity company, I'd be explicitly putting something in my terms and conditions that commercial AI data-centre use of my company's supply is to be charged double or triple, and that undeclared use will be subject to heavy legal repercussions and surcharges.
There has to already be precedent for specific commercial uses of resources being treated differently from others. And if not, commercial versus non-commercial use may be a close enough precedent.
Likewise, if I'm the oil company or builder of power plants, generators and the like, I'd be putting a similar clause in.
This would then be one of those situations where desires align, however different the goals.
Name and shame them. Send them a complaint.
Relatedly, does anyone know if there's a public list of sites that don't work (properly or at all) in Firefox somewhere? A quick (non-Google) web search doesn't seem to turn one up. If I was working at Mozilla, that would be the kind of database I might be interested in making a public resource. And I don't mean as part of the Bug Tracker, though links between the two for legitimate problems could be useful, I guess.
Something with a very basic interface that has an offending site name, how it doesn't work, perhaps why, and what, if anything, Mozilla can do about it. In short simple sentences. One per offending site in 16pt text. And a search feature for when it runs to the hundreds.
It could be something like: [favicon/logo] example.com - Outright states that it will not support Firefox. Mozilla cannot do anything about this. Complain to Example Inc. [favicon/logo] example.net - interface is buggy in Firefox. Site misuses web standards in a way incompatible with Firefox's renderer. We are looking into this. [favicon/logo] example.org - interface does not load. Site uses non-standard Google-only CSS properties. We are looking into this, but you could also contact The Example Organisation to ask them to review their CSS. etc.
I've not had any problems with the handful of sites I use, at least not outside of something caused by browser security or add-ons which I eventually figured out how to fix.
That said, I've probably forgotten a handful I just straight up refused to visit again when they didn't work and now they're not in my regular rotation any more, so I don't notice.
At most, a week. Family would notice otherwise.
I'm sorry that your relationship with yours isn't good.
The more underhand tactics all get a pass though. Outright lying to the suspect(s). Other dirty tricks to get, and keep, the suspect(s) talking without access to legal representation. Prison snitches who somehow obtain a perfect confession with details that only the perpetrator would know... but also the police who totally wouldn't coach the sort of person who'd do anything for less time behind bars.
And there's often the implication that suspects who jump the hoops and get legal representation, otherwise keeping their mouths shut are uncooperative scum who are probably guilty and should be thought of poorly, when it's a perfectly valid way to act even if you're completely innocent. In fact, it's the best way to act because you have no idea if the police are corrupt and/or lazy and are looking to pin the crime on someone, anyone, and that might well be you.
OP's example is having a toilet paper accident and poking their own rectum, which I doubt is the most painful thing in the world and other people are going for the "most painful" interpretation, so I thought I'd cover all bases.
Immediately order a DNA test and/or a second opinion. There's no way I'm not my parents' child.
I look and sound too much like my father, so I'd have to be the product of an affair of his, and my mother would have left him and cut off contact with whichever relative was actually my mother if he'd done that. She absolutely would not have adopted me and raised me as her own.
I mean, I like the idea that I'm actually the beneficiary of an extremely wealthy family, but it's simply not the case.
Edit: beneficiary, not benefactor