It's already a feature
Bottom 2 arrows when in the comment section
As far as I know, no one ever says "I sleep at 2100 hrs (twenty-one hundred hours)". We say "I sleep at 9 o'clock" or "at 21 o'clock"). Then of course change o'clock with your lagnuage's equivalent such as "uur" or "Uhr" in Dutch and German for example. Pm or am is almost always derived from context, and if it's not you can add "in the morning/afternoon/evening".
I've never heard of drinking chocolate either, and I'm only now realising that it's a noun instead of a verb in the meme. I only happen to know about Milo because I've got family living in Australia.
Milo is actually Australian funnily enough. It's like a powdered chocolate thing similar to nesquik, but I don't think it actually contains any chocolate.
Hate to burst your bubble, but the calcium inside your bones is not in a metallic form but as calciumphosphate. So no metal frame but one made of a salt I guess.
I haven't played Starfield but if it's like fallout 4 you'd need a perk to even open the minigame.
You basically already answered it yourself. The wings provide the lift needed to overcome gravity. The wings can provide this lift because the plane is moving through the air, which it does via the engines propelling it forward. At a certain velocity enough lift is generated to overcome gravity and the plane can take off.
It won't kill the full 20 hours, but 2 great mobile games that I like without the gambling bullshit: Vampire Survivors and Siralim Ultimate. The first one is free, so just try it. The second one is a monster training RPG where you can make sick combos and synergies.
I had a Moto G a long time ago, but if the gestures are still the same it's a chopping motion twice to (de)activate the torch, and twisting your wrist twice for activating the camera.
The difference is that Valve is privately owned. They don't have to please a board of shareholders who want to see the platform milked for the slightest increase in profit margins.
view more: next ›
niels
joined 1 year ago
Your point was that a chemical reaction, presumably gas creating, occurs besides the already established effect. The paper you linked just mentions that some dissolved compounds can lower the surface tension which can promote bubble forming. This is not a chemical reaction and the distinction is important.