mysticmartz

joined 1 week ago
[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

We need to build a decentralised internet quickly using I2P or something similar and scale and decentralise quickly. VPN’s will be the first to go then TOR after they attempt to control the exit nodes .

We need to show the governments that we are allowed to use encryption and Wikipedia and not be treated as criminals for wanting privacy .

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Light grey on pink is difficult to read , make the site accessible to blind too or partially sighted . Accessibility is important if we want to spread the word.

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve seen a few YouTube videos suggesting to follow the money. It suggests a lot of political lobbyists value a more restricted internet as they stand to profit . Interesting you mention the Catholic Church because someone else suggested these new laws will push children to more unregulated places further putting them at risk.

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Only for UK but I’ve just seen the EU version

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago

I then suggest we build a public list of MP’s that agree with us and those that don’t .

We don’t have to just contact our local MP’s we could contact other political parties and their leaders with a little rewording of the above.

 

Contact your local MP and spread this far and wide:

Subject: Urgent Action Required – Online Safety Act Harms

Dear [MP’s Name],

I am writing to you as a concerned constituent to demand urgent review and amendment of the Online Safety Act (OSA). While its stated aim is to protect users, it has already created serious harm to privacy, freedom of expression, and access to public knowledge.

The Government’s response to the Change.org petition failed to meaningfully address any of these widely raised concerns, offering vague assurances instead of evidence or concrete changes. This is unacceptable in a democracy.

Key problems now being reported: • Excessive censorship – Vague definitions of “harm” are silencing lawful speech, political debate, and online communities. • Privacy risks from mandatory age verification – Requires intrusive ID checks (including facial recognition), creating huge data breach risks. • Threat to public-interest platforms – Wikipedia and similar sites could face UK restrictions if forced to verify all contributors. • Erosion of encryption – Weakening secure communication systems in a way experts call “authoritarian” and “technically incoherent.” • Ineffectiveness – VPN use has surged by over 500%, making the law easy to bypass while still harming UK-based platforms. • Harm to vulnerable communities – Risks “outing” LGBTQ+ individuals and deterring use of safe online support spaces.

Recent events highlight the urgency: • High Court ruling (Aug 2025) dismissed Wikimedia’s challenge, but confirmed Ofcom must act proportionately. • Major online communities and platforms have blocked UK users or imposed invasive checks. • Civil rights groups and tech experts continue to warn the OSA is fundamentally flawed.

I am asking you to: 1. Support a full Parliamentary review of the OSA’s harms and unintended consequences. 2. Press for immediate amendments to protect privacy, encryption, and public-interest platforms. 3. Suspend or repeal the most damaging provisions until they can be replaced with proportionate, evidence-based measures.

This is not a partisan matter — it is about protecting fundamental rights, digital freedoms, and public trust. I request a written reply outlining your position and the actions you will take.

Yours sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address]

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And the steampunk guys to keep them on their toes haha

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don’t know. I’ve not used I2P before but I heard it was a decentralised internet just on a smaller scale like a WAN

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Those LoRa devices like meshtastic look good. I don’t like the idea of TOR and I2C because it’s known to hold disgusting and concerning stuff. But the original principles of the internet and a Cipherpunk approach is on the way .

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Yeah but who controls the on ramps for crypto, KYC is everywhere

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know you aren’t saying this. But it’s not just porn that’s the issue. It’s the wider scope this act encompasses and a trend other govs could follow. I use porn sure , but imagine your facial and sexual preferences leaking. What if you come from a religious family and you’re a lesbian and pitted by this?

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (9 children)

With a payment method from outside the UK? Or crypto where most companies have KYC ?

[–] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Sure but someone hosts these services . I can make a VPN right now and the service is paid by my debit card.

 

Hello ,

As the title says what happens if theUK requires age verification for VPN’s or makes it illegal to use them?

Does that mean everyone will move to tor or I2P?

It seems if the UK gov keep pushing their agenda under the guise of protecting children people will increasingly go dark .

I guess what I’m asking is how does everyone think this will unfold?

M

view more: next ›