Lol I was spelling him with the "ß" as well at first, but on Tapology and Wikipedia is is just the single "s" as well.

Wow, that's a nice statement win after four losses in five fights!

I never liked watching Stoltzfus but he is throwing some power shots today.

Yes, somehow the barrier to actually engaging with others is lost in the fediverse. The guilt of posting on Reddit has been swapped by some strange feeling of obligation and/or pride when posting on here.

That was a strange final with all those inaccuracies. Very unlike a normal Carlsen match. And still he's winning, the beast that he is.

Heavyweight knees are something else.

And now it's "Francis Cyril Gane". Am I hearing shit or what is going on.

I'm calling you out... Vanessa?!

Fucking hell :D

Well, he had a fake-y low blow complaint in the first round already. But yeah, very weird call.

Also the Gane v Tuivasa fight. Gane's body kicks really were the beginning of the end there, I thought.

I think you misunderstood my point. You seem to mainly be insisting on the point that Russia is doing terrible shit, perhaps even more terrible than what other countries have done in recent history. I am not saying that Russia's invasion is in any way excusable or that it doesn't commit extremely terrible war crimes or anything. That much is obvious to anyone with eyes and internet access and there is certainly no disagreement.

My point about the atrocities in other countries that you partially quoted was not to engage in whataboutism (although I do in fact think that death tolls of many other atrocities are comparable and the death toll of WW II and the Nazi regime in general of course much exceeds that of the Russian invasion). It was just to say that we do historically not see a lot of full-scale revolutionising against atrocities committed by governments in authoritarian or even democratic states where it should be much easier (-> Afghanistan and Iraq wars). And what this shows, I think, is that under the right (or wrong ...) circumstances the majority in any given society will remain silent if their own life or their freedom or that of their loved ones is on the line.

Therefore it does not make sense to me to dehumanise people like the guy from the article (who did in fact run away in order to not murder anymore). Because to be quiet and mainly look out for yourself seems in fact like the human thing to do, however cowardly that might seem.

You could of course argue that he should join the resistance and do everything in his power to fight against the regime – and I agree that this would be be the morally correct action. But the upshot of the dehumanising line of thinking would be that you will have to view a majority of the people around you as potential "maggots" as well, as I already wrote in the other post. And I don't think that is a healthy view. Rather, I think, we should focus on criticising bad structures and people in the positions of power who built these structures. And we should celebrate the Russians who actually do try all they can to stop the war and establish a better regime and hope that this will inspire the people who don't do that yet.

But you're right of course that I might think differently about these things if someone I knew had been killed by Russian soldiers or something like that. Being German of course shapes my views as well because the ancestors of most of the people around me were probably in some way complicit in the Nazi regime. And they do/did not seem like monsters but like normal old people that you would find in other countries as well who were not/less complicit in WW II.