I see so many posts where a discussion about the best options for privacy/security related software are dominated by comments about how some entity always felt shady, they can't be trusted and so on. How having optional things like crypto is the epitome of evil practices, even though it may have nothing to do with how the product actually fares in terms of what matters in the context.

Latest example is this thread and its top comment. (I know, the content of the article doesn't even have anything to do with the browser.)

I'm tired of it. It doesn't help.

We live in a society... that is rooted in capitalism. Development and support of any product needs to be sustainable. If in some cases crypto helps, so be it, as long as it doesn't have an effect on the premise for using the product and is optional who cares?

If there are real concerns about someone promoting privacy when evidence shows otherwise I'm all ears. But it needs to be substantiated.

I don't care about specific products, I don't care about crypto. I do care about an informed discussion.

/rant

What I love to see is websites/resources like this one or this one with tangible information, but I rarely do see them in these discussions. (Although I have to admit I can't verify the information presented.)

I remember when 1Password still supported local encrypted vaults that I could sync with my cloud provider of choice.

I'm specifically looking at Bitwarden and am wondering why it doesn't support local vaults. Are there any good reasons that I'm unaware of?

(I am aware of the self hosting option, but I really don't want to complicate things for myself.)

and forks are using FOSSil fuel.

I'll see myself out.