kutt

joined 1 day ago
[–] kutt@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Some worked but the important ones didn’t. This one was the closest to recording the door, and is the one you’re referring to: New footage from the day he died with no cut before midnight

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Your data is more valuable to them than water and energy

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Very convenient indeed... and did I mention that the cameras didn't work that day?

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes they will probably never replace them because they’re actually slower than classical computers in doing simple calculations.

Quantum ML is actively being researched. However I am not informed at all about the advancement in this field specifically.

But the good news is that it doesn’t need to be portable, we can use them just as we do right now with remote access!

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Oh I'm not saying it is technically impossible, it's the opposite actually, it's developing extremely fast. And usefulness and having QCs in our homes aren't that far apart to be honest. Why would John Doe have a QC at home if he's not trying to create a new medication, or simulate a molecule? Probably for the same reasons he doesn't have an MRI machine in his living room :)

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah but you have to consider one other thing. Before creating classical computers, we already had theorized them, we had algorithms etc. We knew why we were creating them.

For QC, the pace of hardware development is faster than our ability to create algorithms. It's very similar to what's happening with the AI bubble currently, we're investing heavily in a new technology because it looks cool to investors, but we don't even have enough algorithms to run on it. It's just a shit ton of marketing...

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago
[–] kutt@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don’t think it will ever reach consumer households, since it requires extremely complex and expensive materials, tools and physical conditions. Unless a major breakthrough occurs but highly unlikely.

Also we don’t really have a use for them, at least to regular users. They won’t replace classical computers.

But you can already access some QCs online. IBM has a paid remote API for instance.

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Or keep auto-upvote on because you agree with yourself. If you get proven wrong you can downvote your own post!

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yes yes yes that’d be perfect, at least EU-wide

[–] kutt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

TIL you can sign NDAs for divorces

view more: next ›