this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
37 points (87.8% liked)

Technology

80273 readers
3626 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 4 points 1 hour ago
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Call me if they create a basic calculator.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 16 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Wake me when they make the contemporary analog to the Apple 2e. Otherwise, this just sounds like a bunch of giant corporations that continue peacocking around in an effort to get VC money.

I applaud the scientists, however, who do this kind of stuff for the love of discovery. Good luck to all of them.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

With the "vision" of current corporations... that won't happen.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

So, around 1947. Took about 14 years to get to being able to put into chips. So another decade and a half?

Edit: and another 15 to 25 years after that for it to be in consumer households?

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

From the byline:

Quantum tech is at its transistor moment—promising, real, and powerful, but still years of hard work away from changing the world

So pretty much, yeah.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Well years could be 3 years or 300 years so that doesn't really confirm OP's guess.

[–] funkajunk@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Seeing as we now have a multitude of tools available to us that we didn't have in 1947, I imagine it would be faster.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

And an already existing consumer base with expectations that were only for hobbyists before...maybe that's a bad thing, because it will constrain QC to evolve in ways that it would be better to explore rather than try to fit modern use cases.

[–] bibbasa@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

science is being slopified