ken

joined 2 days ago
[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 hours ago

This theme is the one used in my recent unixporn screenshot.

8
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by ken@discuss.tchncs.de to c/unixporn@lemmy.world
 

Redmond97-SE is a living continuation of the now unmaintained Redmond 97.

"Redmond" style themes for GTK, Xfce, Metacity, WINE.

Includes both old-school retro variants to emulate Win9x/2000/XP, plus more modern darks for the productivity-focused desktop.

AUR packaging for Arch Linux just dropped.

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Went low-key public with our internal browser project by sharing here on the feddit. If you're a dev, packager, Arch Linux user, or already build Firefox from source, this is for you (others can check back at a later date when perhaps there are more builds running and tested). More people using it becomes a shared privacy win. I humbly suggest that this is currently the most privacy-friendly general-purpose GUI browser out there^1^.

Announce post

Sources

AUR

^1^: Biased? I would never!

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Getting a lot of benefits from it. I'm a happy user!

If I mostly talk about downsides in order to keep this brief:

It can work fine to just install and start using out of the box as it is, even for Linux noobs. You can get pretty far without having to dig super deep. But to really customize it you get into things like Salt management (or figuring out an alternative) and building your own templates. This can take a lot of time and effort. Consider it "playing on hard mode". For me it's fine since I enjoy these things and you can take it bit by bit. Lots of helpful stuff shared in the community like the repo I linked.

It's not 100% jank-free. More niche things like ZFS integration, GPU passthrough and sys-gui qubes take some tweaking or even patching depending on your hardware and use and I have run into bugs with all of those. Chaining Tor and DNS on some IPv6 networks is still not all there but looked like WIP last I checked in.

Would love if they manage to migrate away from github.com...

That said, things are indeed steadily improving and people generally seem helpful and constructive when I look at the issue tracker^1^. I think it's worth giving it another chance now that 4.3 is out.

^1^: Example: Didn't have to report those bugs myself as someone beat me to it. And fixes for most did come in.

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A tangent but in response to something I see around here recently:

People who say Wayland is ready for everyone and that X11 is no longer of relevance - that distros and projects like KDE dropping and deprecating it is A Good Thing: How do I replicate this in Wayland without having to loosen security boundaries or lose out on core features? Or at all?

Not shown in screenshot but sometimes I also run GUI apps or a nested WM (to get the "classic" VM experience with a windowed or fullscreened isolated desktop) in containers. Also obviously need things like remote screen sharing without having to run such apps in dom0 and Input Method integration for non-latin typing. Even with people working on some parts of that already and some ad-hoc early-stage solutions existing, I don't see it happening this decade... My setup works great for now and I'd hate to have integral parts of it getting fully abandoned or dropped from upstream distros like Fedora or Arch if no drop-in replacements exist. Why the push for deprecation? :/

Next time you see someone saying that Wayland isn't ready for them, maybe take their word for it instead of downvoting? Consider how much I had to expose myself just to be able to try to make a point. When we're in the long tail of remaining use-cases, they get detailed enough that you can't explain them without getting personal and very profilable.

34
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by ken@discuss.tchncs.de to c/unixporn@lemmy.world
 
  • Distribution: QubesOS 4.3
  • Desktop Environment: Xfce
  • Theme: Redmond97-SE
  • Window Manager: Xmonad
  • Terminal: xterm + tmux
  • Launcher: Rofi^1^
  • Bar: xfce4-panel

Windows

Top-left to bottom right:

  1. neovim "IDE" with integrated terminal editing dotfiles (Debian)
  2. dom0 admin terminal (Fedora)
  3. Qubes Manager looking at some templates (Fedora)
  4. Thunar File manager about to move a file between qubes (Whonix)
  5. Konform Browser browsing codeberg (Arch Linux)

Each app and window can belong to a separate qube (Xen VM), visually discriminated by differing color schemes.

Thanks to Ben Grandes qusal which was very helpful as base for setting things up.

This is a setup optimized for productivity and efficiency, which is reflected in the lack of eye-candy and gratuitous margins.

^1^: Not pictured - I figured the screenshot was busy enough. If y'all want to see more LMK.

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It can. Depends on how you use it. Wear gloves and goggles when handling .ml and such.

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Stories?! In my games?! We have AI for that.

do you even raytrace

/s

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago

I wonder if there is any difference between https://noai.duckduckgo.com/lite and https://lite.duckduckgo.com/lite 🤔

To remove room for doubt of that just pushed to change default search engine of Konform Browser to noai domain.

Ty for reminding me of this!

[–] ken@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

On Android: Been looking a bit at that but right now it's likely not happening in public anytime soon unless someone else jumps in and starts driving it hint hint

Hope it works for you and that we meet again on Codeberg!

 

For those of you still not satisfied with the Firefox fork ecosystem, we propose to you Konform Browser. Yes, it's another one about privacy and security with a canine logo. But I do think we have something to bring to the table.

This started as a fork of LibreWolf and now stands on its own four feet.

Some highlights to give an idea to those having used LibreWolf or another FF fork:

  • Security: Konform is based on Firefox ESR. This means a more stable base without missing out on the latest security updates, in exchange for longer time waiting for the newest features from Firefox.
    • In this sense (and a few others), Konform Browser is closer to IceCat/GNUZilla than it is to Librewolf.
  • Freedom: Konform allows a higher level of customization. It gives the user control and trusts you with that responsibility. Some examples:
    • Allows enabling dark mode and following system theming even when Resist Fingerprinting is enabled.
    • Allows installing your own self-built unsigned add-ons
    • "Spoof referer source" user configuration option
  • Privacy and security: Disables all browser features relying on external network connections^1^.
    • "RemoteSettings" is completely disabled^2^.
    • No cloud "AI" integrations. You can run Konform on a disconnected network and not notice any reduced functionality.
    • All telemetry, metrics, and ads from the browser disabled.
    • OCSP turned off.
    • tcpdump and see the difference

Oh, and it actually builds on Arch, in contrast to IceCat^3^. In fact, currently the only supported distribution channels are source on Codeberg and AUR.

While it's not entirely newborn, it's still early days so we won't say "trust me bro" here - this is currently not ready for a non-technical audience but rather looking to engage with people who might already be building their own Firefox or Chromium forks. Continuing work on what we consider a production-ready browser while not rushing to ship a single binary is intentional.

I should add that even if we contrast with LibreWolf above, this is not at all meant as a dig or criticism. That we chose it as base and that it's the easiest to compare with is a testament both to how closely aligned we are and that Konform has a lot to thank Librewolf and the wider Firefox customization community for. Like they built from Librefox and Arkenfox to bring private browsing to a wider audience, so are we but the next to try help widen and deepen the browser ecosystem.

Doors open for users, testers and contributors. Looking forward to hear what you think and if there's anything missing.

^1^: One notable exception is allowing the bundled uBlock origin to perform filter lists updates.

^2^: This means that local full-page translation is also unavailable even if in principle it should be possible to bundle and run translations fully locally. It's just the way Mozilla built it. Patches towards allowing users to enable fully offline translations would be very welcome.

^3^: For now; I'm sure they will fix it too. Lots of respect for the GNUZilla/IceCat people.

https://codeberg.org/konform-browser

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konform-browser

Screenshot

 

For those of you still not satisfied with the Firefox fork ecosystem, we propose to you Konform Browser. Yes, it's another one about privacy and security with a canine logo. But I do think we have something to bring to the table.

This started as a fork of LibreWolf and now stands on its own four feet.

Some highlights to give an idea to those having used LibreWolf or another FF fork:

  • Security: Konform is based on Firefox ESR. This means a more stable base without missing out on the latest security updates, in exchange for longer time waiting for the newest features from Firefox.
    • In this sense (and a few others), Konform Browser is closer to IceCat/GNUZilla than it is to Librewolf.
  • Freedom: Konform allows a higher level of customization. It gives the user control and trusts you with that responsibility. Some examples:
    • Allows enabling dark mode and following system theming even when Resist Fingerprinting is enabled.
    • Allows installing your own self-built unsigned add-ons
    • "Spoof referer source" user configuration option
  • Privacy and security: Disables all browser features relying on external network connections^1^.
    • "RemoteSettings" is completely disabled^2^.
    • No cloud "AI" integrations. You can run Konform on a disconnected network and not notice any reduced functionality.
    • All telemetry, metrics, and ads from the browser disabled.
    • OCSP turned off.
    • tcpdump and see the difference

Oh, and it actually builds on Arch, in contrast to IceCat^3^. In fact, currently the only supported distribution channels are source on Codeberg and AUR.

While it's not entirely newborn, it's still early days so we won't say "trust me bro" here - this is currently not ready for a non-technical audience but rather looking to engage with people who might already be building their own Firefox or Chromium forks. Continuing work on what we consider a production-ready browser while not rushing to ship a single binary is intentional.

I should add that even if we contrast with LibreWolf above, this is not at all meant as a dig or criticism. That we chose it as base and that it's the easiest to compare with is a testament both to how closely aligned we are and that Konform has a lot to thank Librewolf and the wider Firefox customization community for. Like they built from Librefox and Arkenfox to bring private browsing to a wider audience, so are we but the next to try help widen and deepen the browser ecosystem.

Doors open for users, testers and contributors. Looking forward to hear what you think and if there's anything missing.

^1^: One notable exception is allowing the bundled uBlock origin to perform filter lists updates.

^2^: This means that local full-page translation is also unavailable even if in principle it should be possible to bundle and run translations fully locally. It's just the way Mozilla built it. Patches towards allowing users to enable fully offline translations would be very welcome.

^3^: For now; I'm sure they will fix it too. Lots of respect for the GNUZilla/IceCat people.

https://codeberg.org/konform-browser

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konform-browser

Screenshot