int32

joined 4 days ago
[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm pretty sure they mostly do it for the profit.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You do realize there are communists other than you, right? Or is that the royal we?

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't. China is VERY capitalist, it's just that the people profiteering are almost only state officials.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Isn't it that they just don't care?

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago

I usea a tiling wm(sway) so workspaces are part of my workflow. 1: browsers 2: terminals 3: terminals(part 2) 4: chats(XMPP, LXMF, email...) 5: IDE(helix) 6: games(supertuxkart) 7: keepassxc 8: Tor browser 9: misc 0: music

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

There is microg which can replace GMS. But we really need an alternative, not based on some company's shit.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

But it's based on a browser that's not made to be secure, but instead to have the most features and comply to all these standards. So removing them will make it a bit more secure, but it will never be good. The best browsers are the ones that aren't made to support javascript and all these other standards. A private browser would be something like w3m or links. Ideally, it wouldn't be HTML but gemini's gemtext or just markdown.

[–] int32@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

failure to comply could result in fines of up to 10% of global revenue or courts blocking services

So most federated platforms should be fine, as they don't have any revenue(usually) and blocking is hard because DNS is easy to bypass and there just are so many instances already.