humanoidchaos

Thanks. This is new to me and I'm going to be looking into it.

No problem.

For my VPN, it tells me the forwarded port in the software's GUI. I'm not sure how to find it out through the command line.

Thanks.

It's my understanding that https provides encryption for the data sent between you and the server. If you're not sending any sensitive data, then the encryption shouldn't be necessary.

Don't get me wrong, encryption is great even when it isn't necessary. For my demonstration purposes though, I chose not to include it.

I also believe it's possible to set up HTTPS encryption without a domain name, but it might result in that "we can't verify the authenticity of this website" warning in web browsers due to using a self-signed certificate.

It's not dumb at all! Don't be afraid to ask. I'm not an expert and still learning myself.

The VPN is running on the same machine that I am hosting the website on. There may be some configuration you can do to perhaps have the connection routed through your raspberry pi with a VPN running on it to the machine that's hosting the website, but I'm not sure how.

Otherwise, you should be able to at the very least run the entire setup on a raspberry pi.

I was able to run the server properly after building it with ./build -g. I can connect if I select the local server and therefore have localhost for ip address and ip management in the config.

If possible, I'd like to find out where I can put my VPN's internal IP address (assuming that's what I need) so I could have the server listen on that interface and let people connect to my server from the outside.

Thanks again for all your help and your contributions to this project.

Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

I'm glad I stopped expecting logic from you people.

Thanks. Now I'm getting validating 2009scape-master/docker-compose.yml: services.healthcheck additional properties 'timeout', 'interval', 'retries', 'test', 'start_period' not allowed when I run docker-compose up.

I'm using the repository at https://gitlab.com/2009scape/2009scape

Just so we're clear, you think news outlets don't use the word "migrant" in place of "immigrant" when the subject(s) is question are known to be immigrants or trying to immigrate?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

So... what was the problem? How did it get "insane"?

Is it because nobody else "big" joined them? Is it because, and hear me out, they decide it was no longer worth the money?

Tired of arguing with you people.

That doesn't mean he's correct or has a point, which he doesn't.

But hey man, you do you. Let people waste your time.

pretty much all

What about the ones that weren't ticketmaster-only?

I find it hard to believe they couldn't find a place to have their shows. Maybe in a major city, but if they were willing to go outside of one then there's no way ticketmaster is going to have control over everything.

It could've been good business for the towns they played in and ticketmaster would be left out to dry.

I guess that's asking too much of them, though. Even though it's really not.

I'm going to have to say nay on their attempt. They could have and should have tried harder.

Always funny how the people in power want to preach that the war is over.