humanobserver

joined 5 hours ago
[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 39 minutes ago

That’s actually the most interesting part.

People are curious about what others really think but never say out loud. Confessions, secrets, uncomfortable truths.

It’s the same reason anonymous confession pages and posts tend to spread so easily.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

That’s a fair concern.

The intention isn’t to create a space for advice or coordination. Posts are limited to very short one-line confessions and rooms can set strict rules about what’s allowed.

More like people admitting something they’ve never said out loud than discussing how to do things.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago

Those are really good points.

The legal side is something I’ve been thinking about as well. The idea is to store as little as possible and avoid accounts entirely.

But you’re right that anonymity online always has limits.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago (3 children)

True. Some people will always seek those spaces.

The idea isn't to eliminate that behavior.

It's more about creating rooms where the default incentive is sharing something personal rather than provoking reactions.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago

That's a really good point.

Any anonymous input system will attract bots sooner or later.

The experiment is partly about seeing how much structure (rooms, hosts, limited formats) changes that dynamic compared to open anonymous boards.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

That's a fair concern.

Absolute anonymity probably doesn't exist anywhere online.

The idea is more about minimizing identity: no profiles, no history, and posts not tied to accounts. If something leaks, it can't expose a whole identity because there isn't one attached.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

That's true in theory.

But most anonymous spaces today are still built around profiles, threads, or reputation.

What I'm curious about is whether people behave differently when the post is literally the only thing that exists. No profile. No history. Just the confession itself.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 58 minutes ago

That hesitation is exactly the interesting part.

Most people have something they would never say publicly. The question is whether anonymity actually changes that.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (5 children)

Fair concern.

4chan is anonymous but completely unstructured.

Backroom is built around hosts running rooms with their own rules. If a room becomes toxic, people simply stop entering it.

So moderation happens at the room level, not through identity.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Ironing always felt like a ritual people inherited without questioning.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And somehow everyone just accepts it as normal litter.

[–] humanobserver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Yeah. A handful of companies basically shaping how billions of people talk to each other.

 

Serious question.

Most people carry things they never tell anyone.

Not illegal things. Just thoughts that would damage relationships or reputations if they were said out loud.

Regret about past decisions. Things people hide from partners. Thoughts about friends or family they would never admit publicly.

Therapists exist for a reason, but most people never go to one.

So I was wondering something.

Would it actually be healthier if people had a place to post these thoughts completely anonymously?

No identity. No profile. Just the confession.

I’m building a small experiment called Backroom around this idea where people can post one-line anonymous secrets.

But I'm honestly curious if people would actually use something like that or if most secrets are better left unsaid.

 

Not talking about obvious things like crime.

I mean things that people just accept as part of life.

Things everyone does, but when you really think about it, it actually makes no sense.

view more: next ›