graynk

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I just realized this almost reads like a Terramaster ad, that’s not my goal; you can search for similar options from other fabricants.

I don't mind that, I'm actively looking for recommendations. I also got pointed to https://www.minisforum.com/products/n5-air, but that one is 500 with no RAM at all, which is quite hefty.

So far I'm leaning towards trying to assemble something generic from used components, though I'm not quite sure what to pick best, motherboard being the hardest one.

As for TrueNAS - I might check it out if I do get off the shelf NAS, but I don't imagine I'll be using the Web UI much, to be honest. And I know about Jellyfin, I'm sticking to Plex just because I already have a lifetime Plex Pass and I like the app on my TV. If they keep shoving "community" features down my throat though - I'll do the switch.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 22 hours ago

ECC is not a hard requirement for me, but if I can get it - I'll try to, as to me it makes sense for something that runs 24/7 and handles my personal data.

I have a very strong aversion to separating storage from my server. I just don't see why I need to route power and network to 2 small boxes (none of which would do what I need it to do on its own + considering very crappy room layouts in rented apartments) and then fiddle with network access, when 1 slightly bigger box would do what I need it to do. Some 7-8 years ago I've bought dirt cheap second-hand Huananzhi x79 with Xeon E5 and DDR3-ECC with some low profile NVIDIA GPU and it all still works now - and something like that would mostly be OK for me even now (except I left it in another country).

That said, it's possible a reasonably powerful NAS will be enough for me on its own?

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

storage box and a services box

That's exactly what I want to avoid though. I see no reason to power and network 2 different small boxes when just one slightly bigger one will do. And as mentioned - 500 is without HDDs, I plan to use the ones I have for now and extend it later.

19
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by graynk@discuss.tchncs.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
 

Hey!

I've decided that it's time to finally get something resembling an actual server for my home setup, and I was hoping you folks could give me some pointers (given the current prices).

My current set up is just my old laptop with 2 external hard drives plugged in - one is the regular portal USB HDD, another is 3.5 HDD plugged via powered enclosure (ZFS and LUKS on both). I want to switch that for something relatively small, but extendable, as I want to add more disk space in the future. I'm selfhosting Plex, Immich and Navidrome, and occasionally some multiplayer games like Valheim. I'm not planning to use Proxmox or TrueNAS/whatever, I mostly just plan to throw Debian on it and spin everything in Docker.

I looked through some guides on https://selfhosting.sh/ and on Reddit, but that just got me more confused, as everyone keeps suggesting Optiplexes and NUCs, but I don't get how to combine that with 20TB+ disk space while ensuring the disks are secure and well powered. Plus my understanding is most of those mini-PC's/refurbished workstations use regular DDR3/4, whereas I was hoping to get ECC.

Should I go DIY route, or is there something I could get as a solid enough base to expand in the future? If DIY is the answer - what mobo/cpu/case should I get? My ideal budget (for everything excluding hard drives and maybe PSU since I have one lying around) is ~500 euros, but if paying a bit more would mean a substantially better deal - then I'd be OK with that. I'm in Berlin, so if you know any good local markets - that'd be great too.

Thanks!

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

so - yes, there is a bypass for an indefinitely enabled apk installation with the annoyance of 24 hour wait when you first get the phone.

not great though, I agree.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

then what is the point of it existing, if it can't be used seriously? why should people spend their time on it, when there isn't a solid base to build on? if you want to do something useful - contribute to an existing project. if you just wanna hack away at something - sure, do that, just don't be surprised if other people happen to hate it when you try to present it as a serious project. nobody would bat an eye if you presented it as "I wanted a to try and implement Signal protocol, this is what I've learned and how far I've gotten".

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 3 days ago (6 children)

of course they asked for a professional one... but those that ask, must know that they are all prohibitively expensive. especially for a solo vibecoding dev like myself

then... vibe-code something else?.. why do you think that you should be making something you are not an expert in, that can potentially put your users into danger and make you liable for it? if it's a learning project - great, go wild. but if it's intended to be used, then sorry - this is just an irresponsible approach that should not be entertained by anyone. I get that you have "positive intentions" but pick some other venue that you can get right. or contribute to an existing project (being mindful of contribution guidelines).

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Cryptography is notoriously easy to get wrong. If you don't know enough about it - you should not offload it to the hallucination machine, because you will not be able to verify it properly, and those who can - will not bother to.

This is not what a real audit looks like and it should not be presented as such. This "audit" is, in fact, slop.

Auditor: Security Analysis (Automated + Manual Review)

Do you not see the problem in this line?

The implementation uses real cryptographic primitives

Or this?

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ahh, I was wondering why there's a Projects next to my projects, I thought I just made a typo at some point

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I was not arguing against it functioning as a barebones xbox-like gamepad - that should've been done IMO. I was arguing against "splitting up SteamInput from Steam" - that would mean extracting all the fancy stuff too, and that's the difficult part.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago

Buying the product gives people the right to use it

It's implied, but it's not clear - which is why whenever you "buy" software you actually buy a license to use it which clearly states how, where and by whom it may be used, on how many devices, under which conditions, etc etc etc.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

I play a ton of mouse driven games that don't have gamepad support and it works great there. I would not even consider emulating the mouse with regular sticks, but with touchpad it's very comfortable

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Since there’s no license file, it defaults to all rights reserved, which means full files can’t be redistributed.

I'm not a lawyer, but I would argue this actually means that even people who get it from Gumroad can't use it "legally". There should be a license which expresses your intent.

view more: next ›