[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 1 day ago

there may be support for L2 networks soonish. the best you can hope for is a L2 copypaste of some other smart contract network at some point in the far future if anyone even cares enough.

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 2 points 1 month ago

I am actually going to end up using bisq2 to buy bitcoin via a reputation-based interaction, turn it into some monero on probably bisq1, and then use the monero to start interacting with haveno. it's way too many steps and fees but it saves me from ever doing any KYC.

12
submitted 1 month ago by goatmeal@monero.town to c/monero@monero.town

I am looking at haveno-reto and it has the exact same problem I had with bisq. in order to buy monero on haveno, you have to already have some monero, so you can do a security deposit. so haveno helps to reduce the number of times you have to interact with a CEX or KYC yourself, but it doesn't completely eliminate it. you may still have to do it at least once, like buying some litecoin on a CEX and changing it to some monero. I'd rather start clean with no KYC and it's very important to me.

what I am still trying to wrap my head around is, on localmonero and even localbitcoins it was possible for a person to buy coins without already having any. there were always some sellers who would let you send maybe a couple hundred bux even if you had no account history or anything, and there was never a deposit or collateral. they would still send you coins in return as long as they got the cash.

someone told me that bisq and haveno can't have this because then people will just initiate orders they have no desire to fulfill, as a form of spam attack that locks the seller's coins for a time, and that this is insurmountable without making the security deposit mandatory. but if localbitcoins and localmonero ran fine for years without this being a breaking problem, why isn't it possible on bisq and haveno? and why can't there be some other way to prevent spam like forcing the user to submit shares to a mining pool to prove that they are earnest? proof of work was invented to prevent spam.

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 5 months ago

have you tried doing it on whonix

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 8 points 5 months ago

when we try to build our own financial system this makes certain kinds of ordinary people really mad for a lot of dumb reasons. they haven't been told that they are allowed to think it's cool yet

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 2 points 5 months ago

terra required too much manual intervention and also aimed to maintain a USD peg. RAI and pureDAI aren't supposed to be like that. so I wouldn't be so pessimistic. I think there is still a way to do it.

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 5 months ago

when are you going to set up a website on tor or i2p so I can download the binaries from there

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 5 months ago

can you write a cash in mail tutorial

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 5 months ago

is it normal for it to never stop having the yellow indicator

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 4 points 5 months ago

please consider making this available on tor/i2p in addition to clearnet github

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 2 points 1 year ago

I've been on the microblogging part of the fediverse for a while. what I've seen is, at some point someone's going to have to rip the bandaid off and instances like lemmy.ml need to defederate from instances like monero.town. they can't coexist with anyone who doesn't think the way they do. at some point soon, they won't be able to talk to you and you won't be able to talk to them. it's meant to be.

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 3 points 1 year ago

try to get listed on kycnot.me

[-] goatmeal@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

a huge chunk of any userbase will never care about opsec until bad things start happening all the time

view more: next ›

goatmeal

joined 1 year ago