fulm

joined 2 years ago
[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I also agree we don't need this movie remade. However, I don't think it's fair to say there are no ideas in the movie for contemporary audiences. There's a lot of subtext if you look past the religious layer! It really is a masterclass in horror

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Thank you for clarifying. I misinterpreted the question, my apologies. Two movies that immediately come to mind:

Vampyr (1932) has a great double exposure sequence which no doubt would have been much easier to shoot with modern methods. Strongly recommended to fans of early horror movies. It features several shots that are both haunting and absolute classics.

Staying with the same director, Dreyer, The Passion of Joan of Arc would be another candidate. The camera angles in themselves are an effect and contribute to the oppressively disconcerting atmosphere. The way the set was designed with holes in the walls to allow for the camera to be placed in certain ways is genius. Modern methods would not have improved on this aspect of the film, but, on the other hand, nevermind CGI or effects, this movie features a bloodletting scene which could not happen today!

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What a strange question. "What older movies made a good use of side stepping special effects?" Do you mean any of the stories which do not need such effects in the first place?

Also, special effects "holding up today" is in no way necessary for a good picture... There are many great films with dated effects.

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I agree with the other posters, nothing to roast!

Everything looks good to me, but I'd experiment with putting the fuzz sooner in the chain, either right before or right after the wah, personally. I'm not too familiar with the superfuzz circuit, but some fuzzes I would put before a compressor, also.

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

If you've never played guitar loud enough to get feedback from your amp, you're missing out!

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Looks delicious! Now I feel like I could really go for a barleywine... Thanks for sharing!

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 months ago

Only 150 games? I'm pretty sure you could find many people with more experience than that at any FLGS.

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

C'est une très belle initiative, merci!

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I fail to see what any of this has to do with an economic system. These are scientific or legal topics.

And indeed, slavery is present under unchecked capitalism as well.

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Very nice! Enjoy!

How are you finding the low friction pot? I heard it was easy to knock it out of position while playing, are you finding that to be an issue?

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Merci du partage! C'est très bien résumé!

[–] fulm@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Forgive me for asking, but I'm not sure how this could be framed as subsidizing private practices?

In my mind, despite flaws with the program, relieving the cost of treatment for patients is worth it.

view more: next ›