[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I'm wondering when this will simply be a feature of game engines, along with AI character generation, terrain/map generators, and AI-driven dialog.

I'm really on the fence about it since it really could put extra life into games where it just isn't normally feasible to make all NPC's unique, dialog etc so you end up with a lot of "I took an arrow to the knee" type dialog.

For smaller studios - or independent authors - the ability to generate high quality content with code could also be a real boon.

I'd still rather not see big studios just go with AI instead of real humans for design and acting though. That just leads to cookie-cutter bullshit and games that feel stale

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Everyone hates on lawyers, until they need one...

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I could see neck guards becoming required equipment after this. Safety regulations are built on blood

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago

$35B could have built some nice transit infrastructure. Just saying

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I could see maintenance costs increases being not insignificant over time. Parts/appliances had gone up notably, as has materials and the cost of people to do the work. There's also some issues with receivables which may end up needing to be written off, and deliberate damage over time. Generally, these do need to be accounted for on a going-forward basis.

That said, none of these should have increased nearly so much as the cost of property and overall rents. They should account for a reasonable increase over time, instead what we see is increased to cover the cost of the mortgage on additional rental properties etc

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah but he's on the wanted list because it's terrible behavior for a bear. He didn't even try to pay!

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this is what gets me. Some parents are shitty, and I can see the issues with this as it's not unheard of for kids to be kicked out by homophobic parents after being outed, etc

But in the flip side, parents are legally responsible for their kids try increasingly cut off from the information that might be important for caring for those kids. They can ask a doctor to not disclose drug use, and apparently now a teacher not to disclose their gender identity decisions, leaving the parent might be clueless up to the point where it grows into a major issue and blindsides them.

Life isn't an episode of Leave It To Beaver. Not all kids have daily sit-downs with their parents where they discuss in detail everything about their lives. At a certain point, a lot of kids often start cutting out their parents thinking that it's part of establishing their own independence, and sometimes -especially with issues of sexuality/etc - they may be embarrassed to bring those forward to their parents.

Do parents have a right to know everything about their kids lives? Maybe not. Parents DO have a responsibility towards help educate their kids, help them navigate life and deal with major life changes and decisions. Educators have historically had a duty to keep parents informed of major developments in school which might affect their children or - if they have evidence the child is at-risk - to report cases of abuse to the appropriate authorities.

It's a tightrope, for sure, but expecting parents to do their job while potentially withholding vital information is not a good look either, and a lot of decisions from government (on both sides) lately are starting to have a "it's for the children" authoritarian feel.

I would support my kids regardless of how they choose to identify, their sexual orientation, etc, but when stuff is happening in regards to that I would damn well want to KNOW so that I can support them properly (possibly including learning more myself)

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah not sure exactly what a union even has to be "sorry" about in regards to a bunch of evil pieces of shit doing terrible things oversees

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

I think there was also some threats of beheadings more recently

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

They could, but that's still going to take a lot to balance the scales. It should be part of an overall plan for housing affordability

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Slumlords and overpriced rentals can be storage issues though. It can be a nice place, but if you're paying $2k+/mo for a 1b1b that's way too fucking much even if it's in good condition

[-] errorgap@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

This feels like a crappy situation to be in. Governments up the chain have obviously dropped the ball if we're bringing in refugees without actually having solid plans to support them, sponsors etc.

Meanwhile increasing amounts of citizens are suffering from homelessness due to the housing crisis.

If they think that "denying refugees" is going to spur racism and xenophobia, what exactly do they think will happen when citizens are turned away because the shelters are full of refugees the governments didn't adequately plan for?

2
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by errorgap@lemmy.ca to c/software_alternatives_linux@lemmy.ca

You can clone a drive from one machine to another using "dd" and netcat (nc)

Caveats:

  • The commands should be run a root

  • Data on the destination device will be overwritten, so double-check that you get the right one (maybe check with "lsblk" etc)

  • The drive on the destination machine must be at least as big as the source

  • The data on the source device should not changed while it is being cloned. Make sure it has no mounted partitions (it's a good idea to boot from USB). Ditto the destination drive

  • The source machine must be able to reach the destination on the port specific (not blocked by firewall etc)

  • Data is sent unencrypted over the network, so make sure you get the right destination and your network is trustworthy/secure (you could so this over the internet - firewall rules permitting - but I wouldn't recommend doing so with a drive containing sensitive data and it is going to eat up bandwidth/data-cap)

The process....

On the machine with the destination drive, run the following (where 11111 is a TCP port the machine will listen on, and /dev/sdd is the device that will be cloned to. Data will be sent in 1M blocks).

nc -l 11111 | dd of=/dev/sdd status=progress

This will begin listening for data on port 11111

On the machine with the source drive, run the following (where 192.168.1.2 is the IP address if the destination machine, /dev/sdb is the drive being cloned from, and 11111 is the port you used above)

dd if=/dev/sda status=progress bs=1M | nc 192.168.1.2 11111

You should see progress on both hosts as the drive from machine to the other

0
submitted 1 year ago by errorgap@lemmy.ca to c/main@lemmy.ca

I've noticed that I can't access anything on there itself jerboa, and when I attempt to hit the site in a browser I get a connection reset.

However I haven't seen any posts regarding what's up. Does anyone know?

view more: next ›

errorgap

joined 1 year ago