dRLY

joined 5 years ago
[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 17 hours ago

Here is the text of the article thanks to Bypass Paywalls Clean:

GUANGZHOU -- Chinese airlines will cut Japan-bound flights starting later this month, in what appears to be an effort by carriers to conform with the government's call to avoid travel to the country.

The cuts have not been announced, but official booking websites show that state-owned Air China will reduce its flights between Shanghai Pudong International Airport and Kansai International Airport in Osaka to 16 per week from 21, starting Nov. 30.

From Dec. 1, flights between Chongqing in inland China and Narita International Airport near Tokyo will be cut to four per week from seven.

The airline had planned to step up flights between Beijing Capital International Airport and Sapporo on Japan's northern island of Hokkaido to seven per week from four beginning in December, but that increase will no longer take place.

China Eastern Airlines will suspend its four weekly flights between Chengdu Tianfu International Airport and Kansai beginning Dec. 1. From Dec. 2, weekly flights from Wuhan in Hubei province to Kansai will be cut to four from seven.

Sichuan Airlines will also reduce its Chengdu-Kansai flights in December.

The Chinese government has urged its citizens to hold off on traveling to Japan after Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made comments about a potential crisis involving Taiwan. Major state-owned carriers such as Air China and China Eastern Airlines have been offering free cancellations for Japan-bound tickets since Nov. 15.

Hong Kong carrier Greater Bay Airlines has said it would waive fees for changes or refunds of Japan-bound tickets.

The measure reflects both the Chinese government's call for avoiding travel to Japan and a cautionary advisory issued by Hong Kong authorities.

Japan could lose up to $1.2 billion in tourism revenue by the end of the year because of cancellations by Chinese travelers, Bloomberg reported on Friday.

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I don't own a Switch (new or old), but I know those consoles are still not working with the same raw power as Sony and Microsoft. Given how much effort and money they put into hunting down copyright stuff. Really seems that they could redirect even a portion of those resources into making full use of the hardware and provide help to devs/studios for optimizing games. Though I know it is easier to optimize their legal attacks compared to game optimization.

Noticed only after I finished typing that I went into the below rant like my original comment. Feel free to ignore since the above relates to your reply. lol

I was/am hoping that given the popularity of the Steam Deck, that it will benefit more PC games to be at least a little better (both for Linux and lower spec hardware). But would still need a lot more people to buy Decks over the other more pricey options, and for the definition of "verified for deck" to be 60fps (really hate that 30 is still pushed by studios and outlets as the standard at this point). And would of course need for the studios to fear dramatic drops in sales of their IPs on all platforms (though I imagine they would rather close studios before caring about better code).

Stuff like DLSS/FSR also don't help in making studios/devs care to bother, or make the GPUs actually better for 1400p/4k (not looking forward to fake 8k) unless you turn the option on. Just so many excuses while charging more and more. The dramatic jumps in prices for the consoles and components further makes things worse for even wanting to play games. I can't imagine being a parent and having my kids that want to game these days (consoles being like $300~$400 for a "it just works and can play basically all games" are now costing more than launch prices. Even though that is in-part due to tariffs, it still makes it really hard for lower income households. So it means now more than even a few years ago that these games actually run super well to justify all the money. All that will remain are mobile crapware that are ads with game elements.

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Prices are so wild with every new release, especially given the gains are not great. They really need to figure out some game changing ways to cool the devices in order to get more performance out of the chips without just defaulting to just sticking even more thermally intense releases. We just get chips that are more and more expensive that don't reflect prices. And just means it sucks so much worse if they get dropped (being handhelds) or stolen. Like it sucked if my GBA or even PSP where to get stolen, but at least the price for a new one wasn't anywhere near as bad of a hit to take.

The current state of how games are made doesn't help either. They don't put in anywhere near the levels that games from decades ago did to optimize to get everything possible from the hardware. It is cool to see/hear about how devs would pull off wild stuff on consoles in the 80's/90's given the specs. Same can be said of PC games in the 90's being much more playable on potato pre-builds that were "the family computers."

But now we are lucky to even get high-end builds to run correctly on launch (let alone the average hardware). Seeing the GHz number means nothing functionally anymore (not a great metric even before). A 3GHz Pentium or Athalon feels like it might as well say 800MHz with how bad even just booting and opening Windows Settings runs. Getting a $500 card seems to mean needing to just turn off so many things (even though the card companies love to put "gaming" on them and talk about ray tracing (but at bad performance and needing to default to DLSS/FSR to be anywhere close to 60fps). The handhelds and their ability to be used as a regular PC connected to a TV/monitor really have the chance to bring more people to PC gaming while also being really useful. But much like laptops, they don't "feel" like the hardware is actually being fully used. Obviously there are bumps here and there, but they aren't noticeable in the ways upgrading PCs or even consoles felt in the 90's and 00's.

All the nice charts and graphs get brought out, but in use they seem like placebos at best. Though the hardware manufacturers don't get all the blame for it. The software devs for even non-gaming programs just love to waste resources as if they are THE only programs you will use. Can see this daily at my job seeing how basically all the major programs now default to running on start-up. And even if they offer a option in the program to actually turn that off, they now love to only give that option if you sign in. You accidentally open Spotify? Now it launches on startup and can't be officially disabled or removed from the list of startup programs in Task Manager until you sign-in (and even then it is not obvious right away how to do so). Creative Cloud both not signed in or fully signed in goes nuts too. So many times I am able to make customers' PCs seem brand new by just being OCD about disabling all the game launchers, chat apps, and whatever else (especially on laptops).

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Wouldn't be shocked if right as the removal is about to happen, all of a sudden "ISIS" groups start a wave of attacks all over Iraq. The tip-off will be if the USA makes a big show of "withdrawing our lovely troops." Doesn't matter if the show is made out to be a good or bad thing. Just matters that a big deal is made in the media, and that it then gets turned into Iraq "begging" the USA to come back. This time with huge permanent bases and even more control over the Iraqi government. Or have the IOF conveniently be the ones to take the lead while the USA pretend that it can't get all the supplies back in time. Would be useful for a quick turn of "popular" support in favor of the IOF and get all the attention away from Palestine (and further paint the pro-Palestine protests as "supporting terror").

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Might not be the most convenient option depending on your personal use-case, but have you considered a dedicated audio device? I personally got a refurbished LG V30 because I came across a YT vid while looking for cheap options for having a dedicated "mp3" player to keep archived/favorite episode of podcasts, audiobooks, and music. Seems there is a decent fanbase of folks that love the 3.5mm DAC that phone has (of course has Bluetooth too). It also has microSD slot. Got a 512GB card (can use up to 2TB which I might do at some point). Most of the music I have on it is flac where possible. I keep it offline and just transfer files via USB, but could use wifi to sync with PC if I wanted to at some point. Shit lasts a pretty long time with wifi/bluetooth off only using the headphone jack (helps that the battery was replaced by the refurb).

There are also lots of cheaper Android-based players (I got one before I came across the vid on the V30) but can have some amount of malware and no easy access to their firmware or communities that can advise custom ROMs to safely flash something clean and/or newer. When I got my no-name device I just side-loaded apks to avoid giving access to my Google account (though I plan to keep my V30 offline after I got the last updates for the OS and LG apps). I just wanted to have something that I only use for local audio and just keep it in my car or backpack and have access to the three apps I like (Musicolet for music, Podcast Addict for podcasts, and Smart AudioBook Player for my audiobooks).

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 months ago

Hezbollah would be fools to hand over any weapons (not even pocket knives). They should triple-down on getting more in response. They were the only faction in Lebanon to firmly and actively fight the genocide in a real way. If they hadn't been hit as hard as they have been, it would have been great add to the Iranian response of waves of missiles with whatever they could. Even if not as much or as big (size of weapons), would mean even more Iron Dome and IOF personnel burned.

They still did so much and have paid in blood, and I hope that they can build back enough to stand against the Lebanese government if needed. And the Lebanese government should really be more concerned with how the IOF has treated Syria, and wake the fuck up. Disarming is not the answer to the IOF, as they will just invade/attack anyway.

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 5 months ago

This is the only other site I could find with the same title. https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2025/06/20/3338600/multi-dimensional-cyber-operation-destroys-israel-s-internal-communication-infrastructure

Just used unshorten.me on the link from OP, and it seems to go to the site you found.

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Thanks for the reply!

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I am very lacking in global trade (might need an ELIA5). But what are they concerned about? If stuff can't go to the US, how does it mean they just automatically go to the EU? Wouldn't those items need to be bought by companies/individuals in the EU in the first place?

[–] dRLY@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Loving how the pro-violent bullfighting folks are acting as if it bans the whole thing. /s Shit would just ban the killing and maiming parts along with time limits for the bulls. If anything it seems like not being allowed to spear the bull would make their sport much more skill based. Like it is more impressive to deal with a pissed off/stress out bull that has no say in the matter. It seems that even if it wasn't done now, that the younger gens that already don't like it would be doing it once they are in power.

view more: next ›