I read this twice as LLM interference engine and was hoping for something like SETI or Folding@Home except my computer could interfere with ChatGPT somehow.
Seeing that, I too immediately thought, in popehat voice, "It's not RICO."
unsettling.
Indeed.
Not everyone wants ai for their search tools
invasions.
inviasions. Sounds better in Makadonian.
The interminable length has got to have started out as a gullibility filter before ending up as an unspoken imperative to be taken seriously in those circles
Only in these circles could an article that AI can read to you in an hour and forty-eight minutes be clickbait for the paywalled "companion piece."
One is by David Brooks, so it's guaranteed to be half baked?
I can't even
Thank you —she and this video are new to me - very good!
I like the wet your finger and stick it up in the air forecasting model. OK - there’s 1.5 billion pocket-sized iPhones - so let’s say 2 billion person-sized robots, you know,
I’m wondering about the supply chain issues just making the extra half billion robots, might be kind of a big deal. Are there enough rare minerals in the whole world to do this? Lithium batteries? Computer chips?
Also, yeah, valuation based on revenue and not EBITA / profit margins, but whatever.
Not a cult.
from r/EnoughMuskSpam
I haven't seen qualifications this relevant and high-quality since "architects and engineers for 9/11 truth."