brachiosaurus

joined 7 months ago
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago

I really hope we’re even allowed to have an election in 2026.

As long as the choice is a binary option between red and blue i wouldn't be much concerned about the government taking away elections

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

Dems can make some huge gains if they have a working class message. Plan on holding Trump/ICE accountable for their actions and not be Israel simps. It isn’t hard.

you are assuming they are good people and not a bunch of fascists like their peers

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Republicans will burn the country to the ground to remain in power.

Why would they want to do this when each election they have a 50% fair chance of winning? The current system is as perfect for them as it could be, they cycle in power periodically through legal means

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I always wonder about something, as of 2025 doesn't better technology to create a theremin exist? for example using lasers or motion capture sensors. I also got an open theremin (i like the historical value the theremin has) but as an instrument to play i'm concerned about his reliability in the modern era

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

one of their ministers is publicly bragging about treating prisoners like shit and humiliating them, jails have posters of gaza in rumbles with the caption "the new gaza"

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-LvbfPaST-c

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7G4r2nALEt0

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TODpIN1Wchc

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

They are idiots, simple as that

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Now what about the numbers for Russian warplanes and Russian nuclear subs? What are your sources for those figures? They surely aren’t found in a wikipedia article about the american military

In the wikipedia article about the russian military

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I do notice, however, that you have linked not a single article or source for the claims in these comments. Where are your numbers coming from?

From the wikipedia pages you didn't even open

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_B-2_Spirit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-22_Raptor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_of_the_United_States_Navy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_submarines_of_the_United_States_Navy

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's not that hard you can compare it yourself, google how many military assets russia have. USA spend a trillion in war each year and as a result they have almost a thousand operative fifth generation planes (for comparison russia has less than 25). USA has about 70 nuclear submarines where russia has 20

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -4 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Literally all I’m saying is that more expensive doesn’t always mean better quality. That’s literally it

You are right, more expensive doesn't always mean better quality or more products that's why I am referring to assets made with these money that show that in this case spending 10x more than everyone else is resulting in a bigger and more advanced army

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Information on quantities is minimal, but from what we know China is further along and these fighters have been spotted.

USA has plenty of classified weapons we are not talking about. We are comparing assets we know of that already exists and that can be used to wage war today.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -4 points 1 month ago (12 children)

You didn't answer the question, go ahead and bring up the 10x cheaper russian assets that can match fleets of f22 and f35

view more: ‹ prev next ›