blartcap_

Why are you assuming anyone here would consider otherwise?

Is this based on anything or is it just wishes and hopes

Provincial, not federal.

Of course a COD marketing middle manager just had to mention that they feel threatened by leftists regularly.

“The British didn’t colonize The Falklands, it was an empty island, but also the Argentinians are the real colonists because they wanted sovereignty over a neighboring island which was the rightful possession of a country on the far end of another hemisphere” is a level of mental gymnastics Olympic Athletes would marvel at.

Yes, it is. But I didn't ask for your floor routine. I pointed out what was explicitly said above to start this comment thread since you seem to have lost the thread of thought.

It’s soccer hooligans holding up posterboard covered in sharpie and y’all act like you just survived Verdun.

I see no evidence that rockSlayer is a soccer hooligan or wrote his comment down on a posterboard. I just see what he posted here, in a comment.

No, it was about the Argentinian claim being the anti-colonialism one somehow, and this was supposed to be some kind of justification for that claim.

It does if the argument is about colonialism.

Funny how quick the anti-colonialism argument got abandoned when facts entered the picture.

It can't be both a traffic stop and a home.

Because that's not the comparison being made.

Meanwhile men who insist on cargo shorts and flip flops to go with ill-fitting graphic t-shirts complain that women don't find them attractive and turn into incels.

So what exactly is happening when people wear these danger-pants? Apparently the voluminous fabric gets wrapped around itself, as well as the wearer’s ankles and feet, causing them to trip.

Surely that’s always going to be an issue with this kind of very baggy design? That’s what stylist Clare Chambers told the Metro. “The wider the leg, the more likely it is to get caught and wrapped around the opposite leg/foot causing the wearer to trip and fall,” she said.