Your vibe is "reads really far into things without actually explaining what they think is going on"
Does my post not acknowledge, in the plainly written text, that there's likely other varieties that are appropriate?
So I ask again, what argument are you trying to make, emphasis on the trying?
Seems that way. Person 2 above said "it's not x but it is y", person above said "you can stop at it's not x" implying to me they are fine with "but it is y". What's wrong with that inference?