antifuchs

joined 1 year ago
[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Here’s Dave Barry, still-alive humorist, sneering at Google AI summaries, one of the most embarrassing features Google ever shipped.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago

Ooooh that would explain a similarly weird interaction I had on a ticket-selling website, buying a streaming ticket to a live show for the German retro game discussion podcast Stay Forever: they translated the title of the event as “Bleib für immer am Leben”, guess they named it “Stay Forever Live”? No way to know for sure, of course.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s distressingly pervasive: autocorrect, speech recognition (not just in voice assistants, in accessibility tools), image correction in mobile cameras, so many things that are on by default and “helpful”

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

Poor rich guy, forced by the leftmost party available to support the party that is now constructing concentration camps.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Geordi, disgusted: being a _con_tent creator

Geordi, interested: being a con_tent_ creator

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now I’m curious how a protected class question% speedrun of one of these interviews would look. Get the bot to ask you about your age, number of children, sexual orientation, etc

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

Fucking rude to drag lisp into this. How dare they.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 14 points 2 months ago

According to some scholars, s-risks warrant serious consideration as they are not extremely unlikely and can arise from unforeseen scenarios.

Guys I have found a way to phrase my anxiety in a way where every single word is extremely load-bearing

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Unilever are looking for an Ice Cream Head of Artificial Intelligence.

I think I have found a new favorite way to refer to true believers.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 2 points 2 months ago

I’m sure there are plenty of true believers (there always are in startup brain land), but even true believers like spending money.

[–] antifuchs@awful.systems 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s the risk:benefit tradeoff always. Sure you can hold on to all your illiquid stock in a private company with transfer restrictions, but will that pay for a house or even a banana? Does it ever not. The “take a loan for liquidity until you can sell some stock” trick worked for a little bit but companies are wise to that too now, and don’t allow it.

So people can pick between real money they can spend on stuff (or invest in a slightly less illiquid way) or being paper multimillionaires with no actual liquidity; not a hard choice imho.

view more: ‹ prev next ›