snikket looks really nice. i tried ejabberd but failed setting it up ๐๐๐ but snikket looks promising.
kinda funny to recommend Google Keep inside a privacy-community :) but ok, everybody has their threat-modell i guess :D
but why isnt it secure? if you know that the other person is using the same version of omemo it is secure. and if you are self-hosting it, meta-data is no issue either
I am asking because I want to understand the "hype" about XMPP that and why it is always mentioned when someone is asking for a good privacy friendly messenger :)
good points altough the number is note saved. the hash of the phonenumber is hashed so Signal could not hand out your number, just the hash.
i like to have temp-adresses but it is a little to annoying for me to extend them after 90 days ๐ with proton this is easier since you dont need to remeber that and you can find this option pretty easy when in tge webbrowser of choice.
hm I dont really agree on this. it is a swiss service (i think) but it is all closed source so that is a red-flag for me (if talking about privacy or transparency).
Hardened Firefox on my PC and Waterfox on my phone. Reason: mostly because I have been using Firefox for a long time and I want to stay away from Chromioum-based browsers (but not out of privacy concerns :) ).
makes sense :) well I guess I am going to join your newsletter anyway to stay in the loop :)
wow, that look really promising. altough I read, that you are making only your clients open-source. wouldn't it be better to have also the server-side open-source?
well I haven't really thought of a threat model jet (but I will do so now :) ). But in general I want a VPN, for when I am on the wifi @work and also to route my traffic through from my DreamMachine.
i know Signal and use it with a few friends but i am always on the adventure of trying out new ways of communication and that is why i was wandering if Rocket.Chat could be a good privacy messaging option :)