addie

Yeah, considering how dusty and hard-to-clean normal laptops are, this thing looks like hell. If you need a decent keyboard for extended typing, it's not so hard to carry a USB / Bluetooth one, this just looks like the worst of all worlds.

I understand that things have changed a bit since I first moved over to Linux - moving from Red Hat Linux to Ubuntu 'Warty Warthog' was such a revelation in overall user-friendliness and usability, back in the day. But upgrading my graphics card from an NVidia one to an AMD was a similar change. I might have only just installed the base operating system and a desktop environment and haven't got around to a web browser yet, but I've already got full hardware accelerated graphics - that's crazy.

Most distros now make the NVidia drivers a complete non-issue, I think? My 6600XT is requiring just a few too many compromises on new games, so I'll need something new too, sooner or later. I used to hold off on graphics cards updates until I could get something twice as good so that it was a noticeable upgrade, but I could buy a pretty decent second-hand car for all the ones which are 'twice as good' now.

An upgrade from a 1050 Ti shouldn't be such a problem. Well done on keeping it alive so long - I had a GeForce GTX 970 that would have been a similar age, but it let out its magic smoke years ago.

It's a lot compared to a year ago, no? And yeah, agencies tend to be very risk-averse, don't want to move to an unproven platform. A few success stories will help the rest follow.

"Dicks out for Harambe" on the right there.

'Ty chuju jebany', nice.

Our Polish taxi driver does a very solid line in 'kurwa' every other word, but it's always nice to expand your horizons.

Indeed - most Java IDEs have FernFlower built in, so it's dead easy.

Decompiled Java is surprisingly close to the original, especially compared to eg. decompiled C++; good luck with that. You get all the class, function and variable names back on the original line numbers.

What you do not get back is any comments. So you can see what and how, but not why. Admittedly, most comments are kind of useless and do not explain 'why' very well, but for weird-but-critical code they can be essential.

Indeed - I've seen more people recommend Hannah Montana Linux (apt-based) than any of those for newcomers recently.

You are entirely right that a Linux distribution is really just its package manager, the default packages installed, and some remote repositories which may (or may not) have had some customisation applied, which will have been pulled and built from a source repository somewhere. All that's really needed to swap between eg. Arch, Manjaro or Cachy is to update the repo files and issue a package manager update command, although I'd probably like to verify my backups and get a stiff drink first.

The House of Linux is built out of bricks, and the bricks aren't that scary - you can take them to bits and look at them if you like, they're usually zipped-up folders of text files and the binaries you'd get from compiling them yourself. But if that's not what you're used to, then yeah - 🤯 .

In all seriousness, I wish that most distros had art half as good as what Void Linux has - got some really gifted people, there.

Strangely enough, "Windows always fucking up my dual boot setup" is what caused me to drop Windows for good about a decade ago. And Linux gaming has come on absolutely leaps and bounds since then.

True, but network effects are important to that.

There were huge numbers of people that wouldn't move to Linux because it didn't support all of their games. Now it does, and lots of people are moving.

There are lots of people that won't move to Linux because they have a random bit of hardware that's not supported, or a highly-specific bit of software they need to do their job that only runs on Windows. The manufacturers wouldn't support Linux because not enough people used it. Ah, but now we have all the gamers, so there are quite a lot of people using it.

Each domino that falls encourages the rest. Steam Linux users are more than 3x Steam macOS users, and we're not that far from overtaking it for general desktop usage. In some regions, that's already the case, and while the Windows 10 exodus can move to Linux easily, they'd need to buy new hardware fo use the Mac operating system. Not many companies would question providing Apple support; once Linux has a comparable share, it would be foolish to leave that out of consideration as well.

Listen, there's dozens of Linux users on Void, Slackware and Gentoo. Dozens! Especially the ones wanting to run the latest games. Can't just leave all of them out.

Strangely, the search page for ProtonDB shows the 'proton rating' for games which have a 'native but abandoned / broken' native Linux build, whereas the actual page for the game just shows 'native' and I can't see the button to show the rest of the information. I'm sure it used to be there; they've started hiding a lot of stuff in favour of making the 'steam deck' results more prominent. But in some cases, 'proton rating even with a native Linux build' is quite important.

eg. Dawn of War 2 Chaos Rising.

• search page shows 'gold'
• actual page says 'native', but 'loads of rendering issues, really slow, broken on multi-monitor setup, use proton instead'.

Mark of the Ninja: Remastered:

• search page says 'platinum'
• actual page says 'native', but 'frequent deadlocking issues makes game unplayable, use proton instead'.

Really, it's a misuse of language to describe elementary particles as having 'wave/particle duality'. If you ask them a wave-like question, they give a wave-like answer. If you ask them a particle-like question, they give a particle-like answer. But that doesn't mean they're a combination of the two; just means that our everyday understanding of big things isn't suitable for describing small things.

We know that general relativity and quantum dynamics can't be quite right. They have enormous predictive power, but they don't overlap, which means we can't model things where they're equally important; the big bang and black holes for instance. "Higher dimensions" is the string theory way of trying to reconcile them - it might be right. But a theory isn't scientific if it doesn't make predictions you can test, and string theory hasn't been very productive in that so far. Amazing maths though, has been great for expanding our knowledge there.