YarrMatey

joined 2 years ago
[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, I will personally keep doing this because more community feedback is good imo. And no worries, I still think even this needs more than one workshop before a governance thread haha.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It seems the responses to this are divided between ban trolls so they do not scare people off the site or let users get trolled and decide for themselves to stay and block trolls or leave the site. Perhaps we can get block lists going?

I personally think trolling is if someone is saying stuff JUST to piss people off and ragebait

I don't think what I do is trolling

We have legitimate trolls that piss people off and ragebait for fun, that is who I am talking about. But I also agree that if someone says something that they know upsets people and does it anyway, even after being told how their behavior affects others, they would be a troll to continue. For instance, I have not named names so they don't get bullied for being called out and it is up to them if they want to come forward. I have lost count of the number of times I left lemmy because I didn't want to deal with the negativity and inaction. I mean this second quote alone is something I've read too many times like copy-pasted lmao

thinking all opinions should be allowed

Yeah, no... I'm not into that at all. A place that welcomes all, including the intolerant, gets run by them. Why shouldn't we try to cultivate a space where many people, even the ones society neglects, feel welcome and contribute to positively? I have too many parts of me that get attacked (woman, lgbt+, racial minority, etc.) for no real reason. We shouldn't have sexists, racists, -phobes, and the fash. Period.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Omg you beat me to it, I loved the chao gardens in SA and SA2.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

I cannot see how mods could decide if my argument has a scientific basis without me submitting my medical history, which creates the risk of being silenced for "bad faith arguments" when i wont do that.

I would not ban for this. You don't need to send your medical history. I have not looked through your posts/comments but please don't think you would be banned for a medical issue you have no control over.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I really like this approach and have brought it up with others. We have a warning system btw, I've used it a few times and it would be great for telling people how many times they have done X before more extreme measures are taken. Before you were either PM'd if more info was needed or temp banned.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would not ban you or your carnivore community. I may be wrong (and honestly don't feel like scrutinizing your history rn), but you don't troll. We will never agree on veganism and your advocation of eating mostly meat, I am a moral/ethical vegan first and the rest of it is a bonus. While there were some seriously questionable things that got c/carnivore banned from .world, the problematic mod is gone afaik and I already have your communities blocked (as a user). We would be able to ban people who intentionally antagonize and troll vegans, and that would be a bonus for anyone tired of the hostility. Do you go into threads essentially antagonizing vegans with vegan bingo, because that is the problem here. If people wanted your community blocked and to be more aligned with our instance being more pro-vegan, that would be a different discussion.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trolling in general should be moderated, but the rules shouldn't differ from topic to topic. If a discussion is good it is good, if it is bad it is bad.

How would you define a troll and whether someone is speaking in good faith? It's very vibes based. I think someone bringing up plant's feelings or their suffering is probably trolling (does actually happen even in this thread), saying they'll eat double the hamburgers out of spite, even going as far to say vegans shouldn't harm bacteria (taken from a comic that was posted recently) is trolling. Right now, bringing these things up to antagonize (even after haven been told these things are antagonistic) is not something that can be actioned against.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can't ban trolls and must ignore them because trolling is not listed as being against the rules. Admins can ban trolls for another reason but this is very murky. I've tried to argue for multiple trolls to get banned but it led nowhere. It does bum me out when I see users getting trolled, I want to help them. I think if I was the only one being trolled, I could ignore it much better. The code of conduct even says you shouldn't harass others but sadly I get overruled and it is exhausting trying to advocate for others when I have trouble doing it for myself IRL (I am disabled). Report abuse should not be allowed but I've read the phrase "chilling effect" so many times I want to lobotomize myself. If users are scared to make reports, the chilling effect makes them not want to report their petty squabbles. If I ban trolls, they have a chilling effect of not wanting to use their accounts to spread hostility and negativity. I think my becoming an admin scared some of the trolls (chilling effect of someone who is not a bro becoming an admin), but they shouldn't even worry about it because the worst that will happen is I will make a ban, they appeal and get unbanned, and I am told I am being mean to someone who may have ASD. If I think a troll has alts, I am supposed to keep it to myself. That's why I'm trying to get trolls banned. Because maybe others already experience the chilling effect of not wanting to participate due to trolls. There are a few topics I don't talk about anymore, veganism is one, because I know it's asking to be trolled and no one will have your back. I know a lot of women left the fediverse because of how toxic it became towards women. Heck communities/instances have been moving to Piefed just to get away from downvote trolling and other troll behaviour.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think people who antagonize others for no real reason, lean into troll behaviour. And it is hard to enforce because currently we have to make a new rule for every troll type we run into.

People would point out "bait" posts and any trolling was always met with "Do not feed the trolls."

I have been told it is "mean" when I do this. So I've gone back to just ignoring. It's been a while since I fed a troll. The number of trolls have not gone down tho.

I do like having some sort of criteria for a troll. I have seen some trolls do what you listed but it gets turned back into something like: sealioning/concern trolling = genuine beliefs, pedantic = ASD. It makes getting a consensus hard.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Ordinarily I would say blocking is enough, but I have seen trolls get reported over and over, by different people, and there isn't much that can be done. Those reports have to be ignored. I can also block one account on my side (unblocking to see reports by them and blocking again), but another account trolling very similarly will also start doing the same thing rinse and repeat. The reward continues to exist as long as there are multiple people to troll under each new account. If we let trolls say whatever they want and not moderate it, we wouldn't have a need for any rules, admins, moderators, anything at all. It would be a free speech Nazi bar. I've actually read so much reprehensible shit on lemmy that I'm surprised you haven't run into this.

Edit: I forgot to say for the "stop replying to me" this is because we have a disengage rule. If someone says "disengage" you have to stop. But, people will say some other variation instead and complain we didn't moderate a disengage violation. I've also seen trolls like spam people, multiple comments per reply, and that gets hard to track for me to understand where/when the disengage happened.

[–] YarrMatey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If someone is spitting anti-science nonsense then it should be removed for that reason

We don't do that currently, but it's an interesting idea.

 

It's no secret that the fediverse has trolls. Trolling is IMO antisocial and disruptive. We have a few on dbzer0, with one casually saying they have 100 alts. I have to say, I'm unsure how to deal with this. I'm unsure how to deal with someone this dead-set on bullying people, even wanting to recall admins. I have been told this troll probably has ASD (as offensive as that is to me) and that I can't impose my beliefs on others. But I have never banned people for disagreeing with me, my problem was that I and others were trolled and harassed. You could tell trolls things like "please leave me alone" or "stop replying to me multiple times" or even "stop following me" and that does not get actioned because it is not against the rules to harrass people this way. Look at the disengage rule, it doesn't apply to these situations. And try hitting the search button for "troll" on the rules.

I've been told yes these trolls are annoying and disliked by many (if not most) people and yes they drive away people like me from participating at all on lemmy or matrix, but that is not enough of a reason to ban. There are also trolls who report everyone they argue with and use their account solely to argue and troll. I don't want dbzer0 to be known as the place that houses trolls that get anyone who argues with said trolls banned. Report abuse was not ok in other forums, but it is rarely actioned here. The trolls I am talking about have their accounts housed on dbzer0 btw, a place that is not supposed to be freeze peach.

I know many of our users like to tell off right-wingers and libs. That can be fine if it doesn't get out of hand ("kys" is explicitly banned). I could say, let's not allow people to troll, but maybe some only want leftists to not to be trolled. For instance, one group of trolls we have is antivegan. Is that considered an example of leftists that shouldn't be trolled (and I do mean trolled, harassed - not just disagreeing)? Right now, there is a lot of room for trolling all sorts of people. One reason for our zionist rule is because we had zionist trolls that weren't breaking our other rules even though our code of conduct does not allow supporting genocide. Our anti-AI rule was because others were harassing some of our stable diffusion mods. People have been sent nasty PMs as well. You can troll on this instance and get away with it as long as it is not explicitly stated as not allowed in our rules. I have been told it has to be explicitly stated, one of our trolls is a rules lawyer who believes they were given permission to troll before their account was made.

So tell me about your experiences with trolls. How do we fight them? How can we change or add to our rules? Which trolls have been bothering you?

This meta post was finally posted in response to my comment here:

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/25902072

 

How do you gals feel about something like this? This hasn't gone through clinical trials so still early stages.

I had such bad reactions to the Mirena IUD and minipill, I've been on the oral combo BC since then. I wish I didn't need hormones but they help with heavy/painful periods (even skipping them), birth control, and the estrogen helps with acne. I'm not sure if I can give myself a shot 😬 I'm pretty squeamish around needles and bad with pain.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/26490389

The technology uses tiny crystals to achieve both long-term effectiveness and the convenience of injections.

-EDIT- Fixed URL - sorry all

 

I love the app so far but I am having trouble with opening Lemmy links from other instances. When someone links to say a Lemmy.world post, I am hit with a window saying I have to have a Lemmy.world account in order to vote and such. This is incredibly inconvenient, I don't know how voyager does it but voyager just lets me view the post and vote/etc. in my instance without forcing me to change accounts. Anyway to get rid of this behavior so it is more like voyager? I want other Lemmy links to be opened in my instance so I can vote and such.

Also unrelated but just now I was unable to upload a picture from summit and had to switch apps to upload the photo.

view more: next ›