Trouble

joined 2 months ago
[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s your fault

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Can’t argue with monkeys

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

It’s the guise of customer service sure, yeah

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Given that it’s not solving the problem it was implemented to solve, there is something wrong with it. AI is garbage, you can’t change my mind

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Stop light analogy is completely unequivocal

You’re admitting the technology is in fact flawed if you think it needed to be implemented with supervision. An uno reverse is, every set of traffic lights needs a traffic controller to stop drivers running red lights. Unequivocal, right?

Just stop because you’re wrong, lol

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s doing neither

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (9 children)

There's literally nothing wrong with the technology.

Pick a lane troll

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (23 children)

The technology is NOT DOING WHAT ITS MEANT TO DO - it is IDENTIFYING DAMAGE WHERE THERE IS NONE - the TECHNOLOGY is NOT working as it should

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (26 children)

The technology is literally the problem as it’s not working

view more: next ›