MPD + ncmpcpp, I hate both and I'm yet to find anything better.
TheEntity
Ultrakill (same devs as dusk)
The same publisher, but not the devs.
I wish. They are not even close.
I can see it working if one wants to customize the compilation flags of a few packages they have strong opinions on, but otherwise don't care about the rest of the system. Sort of like the binary cache in NixOS, where by default you use the binary cache, but you can customize parts of your system triggering a source-based installation for that parts.
If someone claims to do it for "all the optimizations", you can immediately assume they are full of shit. If anything, the true gain is the control over the features to compile or not compile into your packages.
The answer is "currently no", and that might change. Just like with jaywalking.
Originally jaywalking also wasn't a ticketable offense. Do you know the origin of this term? That's the parent poster's point.
Ah yes, let me sideload a 3rd party web browser onto my PC.
Yes, linking the religious leadership of the inherently strongly hierarchical belief systems with these belief systems sounds very reasonable to me.
I have an impression we agree on the reasoning, just not on the details and the conclusions from these details. At this point we're arguing the semantics of whether the religious people rejecting their religious leadership still belong to the same religion or rather they invented their own religion distinct from the original one. In other words, whether the leadership is an inherent part of their religion.
Do I have that right that apart from the above we're pretty much on the same page?
That would be ideal, agreed. I'm not singling out Islam here.
I'm an Emacs graybeard, so complex keybindings don't scare me. My problem with ncmpcpp is twofold: